Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Assistant City Administrator Nelson stated that the City has not increased this fee for at least 10 <br />years. She stated that she would argue that the cost of staff time over that time period has <br />increased, which is why a fee increase is appropriate. She stated that the main point of this is to <br />encourage the extra level of age verification and try to build in some incentive. <br /> <br />Councilmember Look stated that he has never been an advocate of increasing fees unless the <br />City has also had an increase in costs. He stated that he would like to know what this is really <br />costing the City, in terms of staff time. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Strommen, seconded by Councilmember Olson, to increase the fee <br />for the Off-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License to $290 for license year 2009/2010 and to $380 for <br />license year 2010/2011. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Councilmember Elvig asked if these fees fall into a separate category than <br />other fees because the City looks at those fees on an annual basis. Assistant City Administrator <br />Nelson stated that she cannot answer that tonight, but will check into it. Councilmember Elvig <br />stated that he does not see this as a huge burden, especially if people can get $200 of that back. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Councilmembers Strommen, Olson, Dehen, Elvig, and Jeffrey. <br />V oting No: Councilmember Look. Absent: Mayor Gamec <br /> <br />Case #3: <br /> <br />Request for a Conditional Use Permit to Exceed Sign Restrictions; Case of <br />A-I Custom Signs <br /> <br />Community Development Director Miller reviewed the application received for Sunfish <br />Commons for signage to exceed the total number of ground signs and square footage allowed. <br />She stated that the applicant is asking for an increase in the sign that would be approximately <br />111.75 sq. ft. per face with approximately 23.75 sq. ft of dynamic display. She stated that staff <br />has prepared two versions of the CUP, exclusive to each parcel that would be signed by the <br />property owners. She stated that the signs would be placed in the right of way, which will need <br />to be handled with the County and MnDOT. She noted that staff has met and decided an <br />encroachment agreement would suffice for the City's portion. She stated that the EDA has <br />agreed to participate financially, up to 50% of the sign package, not to exceed $14,680, to help <br />mitigate the effects of the hard channelization of Sunfish Lake Boulevard. She stated that the <br />Planning Commission has requested that the signage on Highway lObe reduced in size to reduce <br />traffic safety concerns. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen asked if there were two issues for the Council to discuss, the overage <br />issue and the other financial contribution. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Miller stated that the financial contribution has already been <br />approved through the EDA. She stated that the two issues for the Council to approve are <br />whether to allow the overage and the locations. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen asked if the contribution approved by the EDA needs to also be approved <br />by the Council. <br /> <br />City Council October 28, 2008 <br />Page 7 of 20 <br />