Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CASE #2 <br /> <br />DISCUSSION ON STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN <br />ALPACA EST A TES FOR RAMSEY COMMONS <br />By: Tim Himmer, Assistant City Engineer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />The Ramsey Commons project was approved at City Council on May 13,2008. The project is located at <br />the northwest comer of Armstrong Boulevard and Riverdale Drive. It consists of a 7,800 square foot <br />multi-tenant building, which includes a drive through for a US Bank. <br /> <br />The parcel description is Lot l, Block 1 ALP ACA ESTATES and is subject to the City's stormwater <br />management requirements for developments. The property owner/developer also owns the property <br />directly to the west, which is described as Lot 7, Block 1 ALPACA ESTATES 4TH ADDITON. There is <br />an existing regional storm basin at the west end of Riverdale Drive that was created for the benefit of <br />ALPACA ESTATES 4TH ADDITON. As part of the site plan application the property owner decided to <br />split the regional ponding capacity equally between the two parcels that they own, therefore requiring <br />some on-site stormwater rate and quality control for each lot. <br /> <br />The idea was to develop Lot l, Block 1 with a reduced on-site ponding requirement, and then duplicate <br />the process for Lot 7, Block 1 when a proposal came forward in the future. The applicant would <br />construct the reduced on-site ponding required as part of the initial development, including a discharge <br />pipe down to the regional basin approximately lOOO' to the west. There is existing storm sewer in <br />Riverdale Drive approximately 600' to the west but it is undersized to accommodate any additional <br />flow, therefore a separate pipe would be required to carry the discharge from their proposed on-site pond <br />to the regional basin. The applicant's initial design was to discharge water directly from their on-site <br />pond into the Riverdale Drive right-of-way and allow it to flow down the street to the existing storm <br />sewer causing additional ponding concerns on the roadway. <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />The case brought before Council at the time of approval outlined a process that the City was willing to <br />undertake to construct the storm sewer to accommodate the applicant's properties, as well as future <br />development along Riverdale Drive within ALPACA ESTATES 4TH ADDITION. The applicant was <br />going to construct a temporary basin on Lot 7, Block 1 4TH ADDITION to retain all the runoff from <br />both their sites until such time that the City installs a trunk storm sewer line along Riverdale Drive to the <br />regional basin. It was anticipated that this could be done in conjunction with the Armstrong Boulevard <br />improvements planned for 2009. It was also noted that the installation of sewer and water may be <br />warranted if the storm sewer project was advanced. The applicant would pay their stormwater <br />. management fees for both lots and deposit the estimated cost of the improvement in escrow as a funding <br />mechanism to justify the project. The City's obligation would be to pay for the cost of oversizing the <br />pipe, and the installation of other features necessary to serve the larger drainage area. These additional <br />City costs would be recouped through future stormwater management fees from the undeveloped <br />benefiting parcels, and quarterly stormwater utility charges. <br /> <br />It is estimated that the total project cost for this storm sewer trunk is $70,000, and the City oversizing <br />cost is approximately $25,000. The property owner is now stating that they believe this project should <br />be a City endeavor, and they should only be required to pay their pro rata share of the infrastructure <br />improvement. Staff has told the applicant that we would not advance a project without designated <br />funding, and that at this time they are the only party asking forthis improvement. <br /> <br />9 <br />