Laserfiche WebLink
2. Possible New Mississippi River Bridge <br />Anoka County has proposed locating a new Mississippi River bridge in Ramsey at the <br />location that was agreed upon by Ramsey and Dayton. The County proposed <br />alignment for this bridge would generally be the southerly extension of an alternative <br />alignment to Armstrong Boulevard through right -of -way already owned by Anoka <br />County. In addition to crossing the river, the bridge could offer grade- separated <br />crossings of the BNSF railroad tracks and TH 10/169. In the scenario proposed by <br />Anoka County, Armstrong Boulevard would be upgraded and become part of the <br />State's trunk highway system. Mn/DOT has not yet agreed with eithhx the new river <br />crossing or the highway jurisdictional changes referenced in the AnqMaalty Plan. <br />The Major River Crossings Study Report of 1989 by the Transpgion AWsory <br />Board indicated that projected traffic volumes on Highway 10 warrant additional <br />bridge crossing. With the improvements to the 610 Bridgejirdpe ney east -west <br />highway through Brooklyn Park coordinated efforts to stuff goE �� <br />al needs and <br />solutions to the River Crossing issue should continue.JJublicnion in Ramsey <br />strongly favors a new bridge. The Ramsey C' n as also expressed strong <br />support for a new Mississippi River Bridge c_ sing. — <br />The City of Ramsey worked cooperatively h the C y of Dayton and prepared a <br />letter of agreement on a location of a future Mec irridor that would run through <br />vacant land approximately % of ahVle west of thworridor originally proposed in the <br />Anoka County 2015 Transportationn. The Comprehensive Plans for the Cities of <br />Dayton and Ramsey are consistenfwitftspect to locating a future Mississippi River <br />Crossing. This location is generalillustxed in Figure VI -2. <br />Another critical component Qstucing improved crossing of the Mississippi River is <br />adherence to the State.nd&dad regulations of the Mississippi River according to <br />the Wild and–Scenicaiver&Abrand Critical Areas Act. Essentially, these acts require <br />that prior to plann jn additional river crossing, all alternative solutions to <br />improving trafobresif associated with the river be studied including expanding <br />the existingeossi d adding an additional bridge adjacent to existing crossings. <br />The purvse the corridor study would be to pursue these and other alternatives. <br />2008 Comprehensive Plan <br />2008 Ramsey Comprehensive Plan Page VI -12 <br />-295- <br />