Laserfiche WebLink
text related to 167 Avenue was erroneously not removed. He added there are currently no plans <br />for 167 Avenue. <br />City Engineer Jankowski noted that as it stands now, <br />the City has declared its intention to take <br />the east -west connector over to Variolite Street and there are a number of other elements that <br />need review before this is final. <br />Keith Simonet, 7131 166 Avenue stated he sent an email teAssociate Planner Gladhill today <br />indicating his request to have his property included on the 4ow;3ensity Residential list for future <br />development of his property. <br />Erica Sitz, 6521 154 Lane asked if there will be.an•-r <br />staff. <br />—342— <br />Associate Planner Gladhill stated there is very Mi t <br />email any comments as soon as possible in order to to <br />the City Council before its special meeting later this mo <br />Ms. Sitz stated there were a number of peopl expresseda desire for more passive parks. <br />� in the � related to safety on the trails <br />She added there also does not appear to be an ything in p,,a w <br />between competing uses She stated she vyi.11 submit written comments to staff. <br />Mi' x . <br />Ron Hunt, 17455 No' then Boulevard, expressed K his appreciation for all the work done by the <br />City and staff on the p <br />St. Kat <br />Gary Van; ;r <br />are Drexel c <br />tion <br />Associate' Planner Gladhill stated St ktihai inc Drexel Church c a application plan <br />by <br />to the City and .requested beings connected to MUS A , pp lacation was <br />Council. He stated the reason this designation was not ve =;o shown n the m to was per th 1 t C to do <br />this administratively versus t a nstruction to shonly the portion that is being plotted for <br />\ e * t Comprehensive Plan amendment. <br />hrohgh <br />Mr. Zaetsch stated there have been discussions in <br />din o <br />e p a r by tlia Met Coun that <br />C t umbers and asked if there is an understanding <br />submit written comments to <br />ime make `'''ents and asked her to <br />w,$ aff time to provide her comments to <br />ne clarification regarding the current zoning for the <br />en er n <br />if the number changes, whether this has to be absorbed somewhere else. <br />Communi ty Development Director Miller explained that the Town Center represents dopted <br />plan and if any changes are made in the Town Center, it would require a Comprehensive <br />amendment. <br />Mr. Carlson stated the Met Council would accept as few as 13,200 household numbers so there is <br />some capacity in the numbers currently contained in the plan. <br />Planning Commission/November 6, 2008 <br />Page 16of19 <br />