My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 11/10/2008
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2008
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 11/10/2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:03:14 PM
Creation date
12/8/2008 8:11:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
11/10/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />next year and asked if the City wants to pass something now about administrative fees, but not <br />have it in effect until after it officially passes. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that he thinks the City shoutd make sure there is legislative backing before <br />it moves forward. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen stated that he is in favor of as much administrative ticketing as can be <br />done. He stated that although there is no legislative authority to do it, there are probably 150 <br />cities that do administratively ticket certain offenses. <br /> <br />Police Chief Way stated that he thinks the number of cities that do this is lower than 150, but <br />noted that the City doesn't currently use them for moving violations. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen stated that a typical speeding ticket that would just be paid off, are <br />usually $45 tickets but the administrative charge the County takes is about $75 or $80, so, the <br />City gets $15 to $20 back per ticket. He stated that the City is doing all the work on the ticket <br />and only gets $15 back. He stated that it has been his contention that the City should at least <br />recoup our costs and try to keep it out of the courts. He stated that the down side would be to <br />have a law librarian say that the County is relying on the money from that to pay for other things. <br />He stated that he feels like this is a game they are playing and thinks this may be an innovative <br />way for the City to create more revenue. He stated that this would also help so officers don't <br />have to sit in court all day. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that he thinks some of the fees and charges should be reviewed to see what <br />it really costs the City to process the tickets. <br /> <br />Councilmembe,r Jeffrey stated that he doesn't oppose Councilmember Dehen's proposal but his <br />concern is that if the City takes on our own administrative fines, it also takes on the collections <br />process. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen stated that his answer to that concern is that the administrative ticket <br />would say you have 10 days, for example, to pay the ticket; if you don't do that, you will then <br />have a regular citation and then they have the right to go to court and contest it. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that this is exactly how it worked in Mounds View, where they, <br />instead of a warning for a minor speed violation, issued an administrative citation, so it was a <br />financial sting to people. He stated that it seemed helpful, especially with teenagers. <br /> <br />Police Chief Way stated that they are out there to enforce safety, not to create revenue. He <br />reiterated that it is important to know that this process is not for creating revenue for the City. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig asked what the Council's role is in this. <br /> <br />Police Chief Way stated that the Police Department needs support and to know that it will create <br />a lot more paperwork, so it may involve additional staffing time. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session / November 10,2008 <br />Page 6 of9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.