Laserfiche WebLink
appreciation as long as the Adult Book Store is in existence. <br />There have been no sales In that vicinity since the book store <br />started, so he cannot determine the effect of the book store on the <br />surrounding property valuations. At some point in time when some <br />of those properties are sold, he will be able to measure the Impact <br />of the book store on the property values. <br /> <br />Richard Wolend, 6726 137th Avenue NW, 34-32-25-42-0006 - stated it <br />is at the point where there are a lot of parcels for sale in the <br />area, but they are not selling since the book store has been in <br />existence. The residents feel the assessor has increased the value <br />of their property significantly; however, his study says there is a <br />significant decrease in property values resulting from such <br />businesses In an area. He asked If the Council would move Into a <br />neighborhood to raise children that is next to a porno shop, or if <br />they would bring their children to a day care center which is next <br />to a porno shop. Based on the study and based on the loss of <br />business for the child care center, they believe their property <br />values have decreased significantly. They are praying the City <br />Council will understand and emphathlze and move to reduce their <br />valuations by 25 percent using their valuations just before the <br />book store went In as the base. <br /> <br />(Mayor Gllbertson arrived at this time, 7:22 p.m.) <br /> <br />Mr. Wolend felt the immediate area Is affected and should have the <br />valuations reduced, that area being within a three- or four-block <br />radius of the book store. <br /> <br />Mayor Gllbertson asked If the residents are willing to take the <br />chance that the County Board may even increase their valuations <br />rather than reduce them. <br /> <br />Mr. Wolend didn't feel their valuations would be raised. He had <br />Anoka County assess his home 18 months ago. His is the most <br />expensive home In that area, and the valuation is about what he <br />paid for it. He asked that the City support the residents, that the <br />City and the residents work together. He again noted the request <br />to lower their valuations by 25 percent, realizing It is a tough <br />decision for the Council. <br /> <br />Mr. Keefe felt that If there Is to be a reduction, each parcel <br />should be re-evaluated. The commercial property has already been <br />re-evaluated, but he was worried about the accuracy of the <br />valuations in the residential areas. He again noted the problem of <br />not being able to prove an adjustment until something has sold in <br />that area. Mr. Keefe aisc stated he has a problem with the tax <br />freeze that has been requested by those residents. <br /> <br />BOARD OF REVIEW FOLLOW-UP/APRIL 10, 1991 <br /> Page 3 of 7 <br /> <br /> <br />