Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Enstrom stated that another issue is when the road is extended north; there is parkland- <br />dedicated property. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Miller stated that it isn't in that particular location. <br /> <br />There was a Consensus to move forward with this and have property owner pay for appraisal. <br /> <br />3) Consider Assessment Policy for the Reconstruction of Municipal State Aid (MSA) <br />Streets <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated that currently the City has very few streets that have been <br />reconstructed other than those for sewer and water, and in those cases, they have paid for the <br />replacement. He stated that the City essentially has no policy for this, but there is a policy for <br />sealcoating and overlays. He reviewed these policies and noted that the people that live on MSA <br />pay no more or less than those that live on a residential street. He stated that the second key <br />point has to do with what level of MSA revenues the City has and whether it is sufficient to <br />support ourMSA system. He noted that he attached a case that he prepared for the Public Works <br />Committee, which does an analysis of 10-year needs on MSA streets versus the amount of <br />revenue the City can anticipate. He stated that they came to the conclusions that the City had <br />more needs facing us than MSA dollars, so it would be prudent to leverage those dollars with <br />assessments, when possible. He stated that in the City there is a need for $41,000,000; currently <br />the City is getting approximately $900,000 per year. He stated that in previous years, the City <br />has taken $140,000 from the MSA funds and applied it to the General Fund to pay for things like <br />snowplowing. He stated that generally, on MSA streets, the City has far fewer properties that <br />have access to MSA streets and they typically have double frontage. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen left the meeting at 8:05 p.m. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated that he included the results of the 2006 Street Reconstruction <br />Survey from other cities, which noted that the assessments range from $1,600 to a maximum of <br />$7,100. He stated that the majority are 40-60% of the total project costs. He stated that there <br />were a few interesting comments from this survey that he would like to highlight. He stated that <br />Marshall determined that $5,000 was the limit of the assessment, due to increased property <br />values. He stated that most cities did take the opportunity to assess for an improvement that did <br />not exist prior, for example, if you had bituminous curb and gutter and you got a concrete curb <br />and gutter, most would do an assessment. He noted that he had attached a few city policies to <br />give the Council a flavor of what is out there. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that Andrie Street has been discussed for reconstruction and asked if it was <br />going to be a 9-ton road. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Olson stated that it is currently 7 ton and will be going to 10 ton. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that his feeling is that what the requires for MSA street should be in a <br />policy, but if people ask for more, then it should be assessed back because it is over and above. <br />He stated that, otherwise, the City could use all of its MSA funds for just a few projects. He <br /> <br />City Council Work Session / October 7, 2008 <br />Page 6 of 14 <br />