Laserfiche WebLink
y would <br />to include the higher grade topsoil (as defined pwill will left undisturbed, w would <br />potentially be in the final state (excluding natural areas that <br />ize the on-site <br />not be subject to the topsoil requirement). All other areas completed would a and grade established. <br />topsoil as a temporary means until construction is c p nd the <br />grade <br />This should improve the overall final product for men aand reasons incding: <br />material storage C sion control <br />topsoil would not be compacted by heavy equipment <br />could be reduced (stockpiling and street sweeping), in g) and watering needs are really non- <br />existent until the final landscaping and irrigation is installed. <br />Since landscaping requirements are found throughout City Code, many <br />sections of City. Code <br />will be revised as part of this ordinance. The proposed revisions are summarized as follows: <br />Chapter 9: Zoning and Subdivision of Land <br />Section 9.02 (Definitions) <br />• Definitions were added for Natural Area, Organic Matter, and Topsoil <br />Section 9.11 (Performance Standards) <br />• Repetitive information, related to grading and ground cover, was taken out of <br />each specific zoning district and combined into the general performance <br />standards for all districts. <br />The timing to complete the required landscaping was reduced from one (1) <br />year to six (6) months from the date the Certificate of Occupancy is issued. <br />The required tree and sod escrow, which is $600.00 and is collected at the <br />time of building permit issuance, was eliminated from the building permit <br />process and replaced with an amount to be determined if the builder /property <br />owner is requesting a Certificate of Occupancy prior to having the required <br />landscaping, including topsoil, installed. <br />Sections 9.50.30 (Subdivision Design Standards) and 9.50.50 (Construction of <br />Improvements) <br />• Cross referenced the new topsoil requirement with Section 9.02 (Definitions). <br />The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing regarding the proposed <br />g, the ordinance on <br />December 3, 2008. Based upon comments received ork the n further refine the <br />Commission recommended that Staff continue to <br />making this ordinance as effective and enforceable as possible, and then forward the <br />proposed ordinance to City Council. <br />Funding Source: <br />City Code amendments are processed with Staff time. <br />Recommendation: <br />A topsoil requirement should reduce the city's itteedemand <br />St ff, in conjunction the Environmental <br />per the direction of the Public Works Com <br />mittee, <br />Board, will continue to explore other water conservation Commission recommended that Cty <br />implemented throughout the community. The Planning <br />Council adopt an ordinance establishing topsoil requirements. <br />