Laserfiche WebLink
Council Member introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION # <br />RESOLUTION AMENDING THE POLICY <br />FOR APPOINTING BOARD AND COMMISSION MEMBERS <br />WHEREAS, the City Council would like its practices and written policies for <br />reappointing board and commission members to be consistent. <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE <br />CITY OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br />That the City Council of the City of Ramsey confirms the recommendation of the <br />Personnel Committee to amend the Policy for Appointing Board and Commission <br />Members as follows: <br />1. Incumbents and new applicants will be considered in one collective recruitment, <br />interview and selection process. Previously, incumbents were considered for re- <br />appointment in a separate process prior to new applicants being considered. <br />2. Term expiration dates will be adjusted for current and future board and <br />commission members to March 31 which will allow incumbents to continue to <br />serve without interruption until any newly elected City Council Members take <br />office and official action is taken on board and commission appointments. <br />3. Applicants will be interviewed by the full City Council and the City Council will <br />consult with the chair and vice chair of each board or commission regarding <br />appointments; however, the final decision regarding appointments will rest with <br />the City Council. <br />4. If there are more than five applicants for a vacancy, the City Council will screen <br />the applications and select five applicants to be interviewed. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE <br />CITY OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, <br />Confirms the recommendation of the Personnel Committee to do the following: amend <br />the Policy for Appointing Board and Commission Members as outlined above. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council <br />Member, , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br />and the following voted against the same: <br />