My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 02/17/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2000 - 2009
>
2009
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 02/17/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 9:32:28 AM
Creation date
2/12/2009 11:59:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
02/17/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
20 <br />go to meetings that they don't want to attend but I talked to many people about it <br />openly. <br />At our National Night Out party, we discussed it with many of the neighbors and they <br />were supportive of the idea. A group of us talked to the various Council Members who <br />attended -- Matt Look, David Jeffrey and Mayor Gamec — and they said they would <br />support it. <br />This notion that everything was done against our will, without our input and in secret is <br />complete hogwash. <br />Myth 5: They want to close 142" Avenue just so they can put a park on that site. <br />Facts: This is such a long -shot that it's not even worth mentioning or considering, but <br />yes I did say that "a park would be nice" while brainstorming out loud in a conversation <br />with Mr. Greb about what could be done with a decommissioned piece of road. I <br />mentioned a few other things too but he remembers only this one for some reason — like <br />a park is somehow a sinister idea. The city would never even consider this and even if <br />it did, most of our kids will have . kids before it ever happened. Besides, what would be <br />so wrong with it? In any case, the one and only reason for a road closure is to reduce <br />cut - through traffic and to make our neighborhood safer, <br />Myth 6: The city said all we have to do is get a petition signed and we can have what <br />we want. <br />Facts: If that were true, we wouldn't have sat through 3 years of meetings! The <br />process was developed years ago and that process has been completed. The Public <br />Works Department has already conducted all of the meetings, gathered all of the data, <br />heard all of the debate, made recommendations to City Council and City Council has <br />approved the temporary closure. It is going to happen with or without Mr. Greb's <br />"petition." <br />In my opinion, he is making promises that he can't possibly keep just to make it appear <br />as if he has a groundswell of support and to represent that he is "speaking on your <br />behalf," I stron • I caution ou: It would be ve unwise to • ive an one the im • ression <br />that ou are allow! • them to s•eak on our behalf either verbal! or in writine. Make it <br />au will s <br />eak for ourself. If ou are uncomfortable in a <br />• <br />clear in no uncertain terms that <br />public forum, you can always call (phone numbers are below) or send an email or a <br />letter and ask that your written comments and concerns be attached to the agenda <br />items handed out at the meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.