Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Motion by Councilmember Elvig, seconded by Councilmember Cook, to direct staff to work <br />closely with the neighborhood to conduct a survey regarding the Public Works Committee <br />offering the neighborhood a 50/50 split on paving the road for a more permanent fix, with the <br />neighborhood to forward a petition to the City if they would like to proceed. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: City Engineer Jankowski questioned if the Committee would like to send <br />out a survey asking the neighborhood if they would be interested in the project at a 100 percent <br />cost and if they would be interested in the project at a 50 percent cost. Councilmember Cook <br />suggested staff hold a neighborhood meeting to discuss the options. He commented if the <br />property owners are given all the information they will know they are getting some benefit from <br />the City. Assistant Public Works Director Olson asked if the Committee would like to wait for <br />Council ratification prior to discussing this with the neighborhood. Public Works Director <br />Kapler indicated staff would prefer to have direction from the Council prior to discussing this <br />with the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig withdrew the motion on the floor. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Elvig, seconded by.CouncilmemberCook, to recommend the City <br />Council ratify a 50 50/50 split of the cost of paving the current dirt surface of the road segments <br />of 163rd Lane, Uranimite Street, 1 64th Lane, Sapphire Street, and 1641h Avenue, with staffto . <br />prepare a survey and host a neighborhood meeting after Council ratification. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Zimmerman, Councilmembers Elvig and Cook. <br />Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #2: <br /> <br />Public Works Campus Layout and Tour <br /> <br />Public Works Director Kapler noted the Committee was given a tour of the Public Works <br />Campus at the beginning of the meeting. He asked if the Committee has any questions. <br /> <br />Chairperson Zimmerman indicated he would suggest the City try to obtain the property all the <br />way out to as it will be needed quickly. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Cook, seconded by Councilmember Elvig, to recommend that the <br />City C;~~g~L.,~~~!~~~~he City taking control of the current property at the Public Works Campus <br />out to lllmioni:te;~tneet~ <br />'0'. _c~_.,.:._....,:."_,--_,....c._.~,."._..,..,,_,__,,_,,,_,_,_.'__c_._,__,_..'.,.,.,.,._.'_,_, <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Zimmerman, Council members Cook and Elvig. <br />Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Assistant Public Works Director Olson noted staff is cramped in the current <br />Public Works building with the current staff, and over the next ten years the projection is for an <br />additional Public Works employee every year due to the growth ofthe City. There is an issue of <br />how to have all the employees in the building and still hold a useful management meeting in the <br /> <br />Public Works Committee/July 20, 2004 <br />Page 4 of8 <br />