My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 03/05/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2009
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 03/05/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:59:55 AM
Creation date
2/27/2009 11:57:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
03/05/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The proposed amendment requires the same submittal materials for administrative reviews as for full <br />reviews. Staff would complete the same review for administrative reviews as for a full review, without <br />forwarding the request to the Planning Commission and City Council. The 60 day review period, per <br />State Statute, will still be followed. A site plan approval, whether it be administrative or full review, will <br />still be required for development in commercial and employment districts prior to applying for a building <br />permit. Multiple family dwellings (3 units or more), mobile home parks, and all proposed developments <br />within the Flood Plain, Scenic Rivers, Environmental Protection, and Critical Rivers Overlay Districts <br />will not qualify for administrative site plan review. <br /> <br />For site plans t<,?viewed administrative.1Y, Staff is recommending collecting the same application fee and <br />escrow as full site plan reviews in case it is determined that an administrative review actually requires a <br />.full review. Since considerably less time will be spent preparing cases for Planning Commission and CIty <br />Council Agendas, it is anticipated that some of the escrow will be refunded upon approval. A <br />Development Permit,' consistent with current standards,. will be drafted and signed prior to issuance of a <br />Building Pennit. If approved, the proposed ordinance would require review by applicable agencies as <br />needed. For example, site plans along County Roads would still need review by Anoka County. <br /> <br />The proposed amendment does not affect the current Town Center development review process. <br />Development proposals will continue to follow that review process and will not be reviewed <br />. . <br />administratively. <br /> <br />Funding Source: <br /> <br />Amendments to City Code are handled through normal staff duties. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends approval of Ordinance #09-_ amending City Code Section 9.03 (Administration) <br /> <br />Commission Action: <br /> <br />Recommend that City Council approve/deny Ordinance #09- to amend City Code Section 9.03 <br />(Administration). <br /> <br />Reviewed By: <br />Community Development Director <br />Enviromnental Coordinator <br />Economic Development Coordinator <br /> <br />PC: 03/05/2009 <br /> <br />Attachments: <br />Attachment A: Proposed Amendment to City Code Chapter 9.03 (Administration) <br />Attachment B: Proposed Ordinance Amending City Code Chapter 9.03 (Administration) <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.