My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/10/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2009
>
Agenda - Council - 03/10/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 3:54:33 PM
Creation date
3/5/2009 11:21:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/10/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
400
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Myth 3; Instead of closing 142 � Avenue, closing Argon Street south of 14 d L a ne <br />would be more convenient and will still prevent cut - through traffic bet e D y sp rosium <br />and 47, <br />Facts: It would only be more convenient for those of us south of the barricade That <br />Includes Mr, Greb and this Is why he is proposing this and against closing 142 <br />Avenue, Those people north of the barricade will still have to go around. It would also <br />be much less safe to place a barricade In front of homes as apposed to 142nd Avenue <br />e <br />where there are no homes. Vehicles will be forced to turn around in driveways. Large <br />dump trucks, garbage trucks, snow plows, etc. will be forced to back all the way up to <br />14214 Avenue to turn around, There will be no place to pile snow. Plus, it will be an <br />eyesore for those folks who live there, <br />Yes, this alternative would be more convenient for some of us including me, but butVitt' <br />not a good alternative for most of our neighbors. The barriers on 142 Ave <br />be far away from all of the homes, it's safer and it "Inconveniences" everyone equally. <br />Myth 4; They slid this past us without our knowledge <br />Facts; The city has a very structured and deliberately slow process for everything they . <br />do to remain fair and to avoid these types of accusations. The city did not force <br />anything on us, This process has been In the works since 2004 or 2005 when a group <br />of us (not Just me) approached the city because we were concerned about the large <br />volume of cut - through traffic. They were gracious enough to listen to our concerns and <br />take them seriously, in fact, Mr. Greb was involved in the process early on, <br />When the closure of 142. 1d Avenue was first suggested at a Public Works t g, Mr. <br />Greb expressed his concern that he did not want to drive out of his way to Super <br />America. That is a fair and valid concern, but that was the last meeting he attended. At <br />the last Public Works meeting in which this was discussed, I recognized some of our <br />neighbors but Mr, dreb was not there, Why he decided to drop out of the process until <br />now is a mystery, <br />There is a process in place that has been followed fairly to Its conclusion. It's thsame <br />process carried out for every issue In every neighborhood in the city, I have tak the <br />time away from my Job and family to show up to the meetings with rather neighbors and <br />sit through the minutia that didn't pertain to us so that we could voice our opinions and <br />concerns, <br />The meetings for the past 3 years were openly announced and conducted. I subscribed <br />on the City of Ramsey website to get email notices of Public Wor Meetings be <br />In <br />I <br />wanted to be sure to attend any meetings where Argon Street wa <br />nnnngpd to less traf fic, on their street or <br />My ' <br />would h ave u gon l e door to to remind people of the meetings. I saw some of our <br />neighbors at every one of the meetings and I assumed if pe ople weren't there that the <br />issue wasn't important to them. I'm not the type to go door to door and hound people to-247— <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.