Laserfiche WebLink
INTRODUCTION <br />On May 27, 2004 a petition: was received by City Council requesting he b bituminous <br />paving; of Ute Street from 179 Lane to a. distance: aapproximately 80 > in <br />(terminating at the dead end turn around). A copy o f f this petition is ontai res to <br />Appendix A. City council directed the, preparation <br />this petition, A draft feasibility study was prepared and discussed with the residents at an <br />informational meeting held on September 10, 2008 and again with the Public Works <br />Committee on September 16, 2008. On January 24, 2009 a meeting with residents was <br />held to discuss issues of concern contained in the initial feasibility study. Results of this <br />meeting were presented to the Public Works Committee on February 17, 2009 which then <br />recommended modifications in this study which were ratified by the City Council on <br />March 10, 2009. <br />The project area and benel:ttted properties is illustrated in Figure 1. This report will <br />identity the existing street condition along with the proposed improvements and the <br />associated costs and tinanctng, including the cost to each bcnc fitted property. Finally this <br />report will provide a possible project timeline. <br />I+ KiSTING CONDITIONS <br />The surface of the existing; roadway is primarily native sand material with some <br />aggregates that have been added to portions o r tile, roadway. The roadway width. is l6 to <br />18 :feet wide, The street terminates in a dead end approximately 800 feet north of 179 <br />Cane (CR27) with an irregularly shaped bulb which is roughly '55 to 40 feet at its widest <br />dimension, This bulb functions very poorly as a turn around for large emergency vehicles <br />and city plows and is even problematic for passenger vehicles to turn around without <br />entering a private driveway. <br />The project area is not platted and there: had been uncertainty verh the legal lei ay <br />available. The City has had ownership and encumbrance. reports prepared <br />properties involved. It has been determined that the City has no rights other than <br />prescriptive rights to the right of way it has been maintaining;. This is roughly a 16 to18 <br />feet roadway width which meanders a distance of approximately four feet along the <br />roadway from south to north., The City has also been maintaining an irregularly shaped <br />turn around bulb at the north end of the street, <br />The northern 200 feet of the roadway drains northward into the City ofNowthcn. The <br />southern 650 feet of the roadway drains easterly onto the adjoining p ro p erty little toward o <br />Roers Lake. Because of the relatively steep grade toward the lake, 1 P <br />except for the area at the south end of the project area. There are few driveway culverts, <br />A total of 11 properties have frontage along. Ute Street. Three of these; properties have <br />double frontage with Waco Street to the west. Two of these three properties have their <br />main frontage and address assignment on Waco Street. All three of these properties were <br />—274— —2— <br />