My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 02/10/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2009
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 02/10/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:21:36 PM
Creation date
3/17/2009 12:36:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
02/10/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />everyone is afraid of mold. He stated that he thinks this information creates more of a problem <br />because when someone comes in, the City is now legally obligated to disclose this report when <br />looking to rent or sell the property. He is not interested in spending a lot of money to alleviate a <br />mold issue unless there is a significant problem. He stated that the person who did the report has <br />a financial interest in additional testing, so he isn't sure how much credence he would put in the <br />report. <br /> <br />Councilmember Jeffrey stated that if there is a mold issue at the building it has been proven to <br />have an effect on. people in a variety of ways. He stated that if the building is not suitable to <br />lease, he isn't sure that he wants to spend the money to get it ready for leasing. He stated that he <br />is glad this was found out now rather than later. <br /> <br />Councilmember Look stated that insurance companies have identified that all buildings have <br />mold and they won't insure against it anymore. He stated that if the school doesn't want to rent <br />the building, then so be it, but he doesn't want to put money into the facility. <br /> <br />Councilmember McGlone stated that he has problems with the study because some of the <br />language that was used, such as, "suspected prior water damage", "poses no immediate hazards", <br />and "could harbor fungal". He stated that these are just a few of the remarks made and he feels <br />the "expert" didn't tell us anything. He stated that his other issue is why the City is paying him <br />$680 for this inspection instead of the school because he thought the school would be handling <br />that. <br /> <br />Assistant City Administrator Nelson stated that the City split the cost of this, as the potential <br />landlord, because they wanted to know ifthere was mold in the building. <br /> <br />Councilmember McGlone asked if there have been any complaints or issues with the employees <br />at the fire station. <br /> <br />Fire Chief Kapler stated that nobody has complained about the building. <br /> <br />Councilmember McGlone asked if this information makes the building unable to be leased and if <br />so, then perhaps the discussion should turn to demolition. <br /> <br />Councilmember Wise asked if anyone has a standard of what is an acceptable level for mold. <br /> <br />Assistant City Administrator Nelson stated that the way it was explained to her is that there are <br />no health based criteria for thresholds of mold levels, but here are EP A and Department of <br />Health standards that require remediation once there is a known problem. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig stated that he can appreciate why the school would have wanted to check <br />this out, but agrees with Councilmember Dehen that there is mold everywhere. He stated that he <br />wonders if it makes sense to try to get more definitive answers with the money already spent, <br />because it puts us in a precarious position. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session / February 10,2009 <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.