My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/24/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2009
>
Agenda - Council - 03/24/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 3:56:14 PM
Creation date
3/18/2009 12:04:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/24/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
209
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
facility and cannot exceed 43,560 square feet{one acre) of disturbed area. The 20% threshold includes an <br />aggregate of any site plan approved administratively since the Site Plan was approved by the City <br />Council. Development exceeding one acre requires review by the Lower Rum River Water Management <br />Organization (LRRWMO), therefore providing a proper threshold in allowing administrative review. <br />The proposed amendment requires the .same submittal materials for administrative reviews as for full <br />reviews. Staff would complete the same review for administrative reviews as for a full review, without <br />forwarding the request to the Planning Commission and City Council. The 60 day review period, per <br />State Statute, will still be followed. A site plan approval, whether it be administrative or full review, will <br />still be required for development in commercial and employment districts prior to .applying for a building <br />permit. Multiple family dwellings (3 units or more), mobile home parks, and all proposed developments <br />within the Flood Plain, Scenic Rivers, Environmental Protection, Critical Rivers Overlay Districts and <br />Town Center Zoning Districts will not qualify for administrative site plan review. <br />For site plans reviewed administratively, Staff is recommending collecting the same application fee and <br />escrow as full site plan reviews in case it is determined that an administrative review actually requires a <br />full review. Since considerably less time will be spent preparing cases for Planning Commission and City <br />Council Agendas, it is anticipated that some of the escrow .will be refunded upon approval. A <br />Development Permit, consistent with current standards; will be drafted and signed prior to issuance of a <br />Building Permit. If approved, the proposed ordinance would require review by applicable agencies as <br />needed. For example, site plans along County Roads would still need review by Anoka County. <br />The .proposed amendment .does not affect the current Town Center development review process. <br />Development proposals will continue to follow that review process and will not be reviewed <br />administratively. <br />Following the Public Hearing at the Planning Commission meeting on March 5, 2009, staff strengthened <br />the language in the proposed Ordinance to further specify that the proposed Administrative Site Plan <br />Review process shall only apply to the B-1 and B-2 Business Zoning Districts and E-1 and E-2 <br />Employment Zoning Districts. <br />Funding Source: <br />Amendments to City Code are handled through normal staff duties. <br />Recommendation: <br />The Planning Commission met on March 5, 2009- to hold a Public Hearing on the proposed Ordinance <br />and recommended that City Council approve. the Ordinance to amend City Code Section 9.03 <br />(Administration), with a language change to reflect that aggregate expansion cannot be greater than 20% <br />of existing building square footage, that language be added that the Town Center and residential areas are <br />not eligible for administrative review, and add language that staff will report to the Plamiing Commission <br />and City Council on a monthly basis. <br />-132- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.