Laserfiche WebLink
<br />APPENDIX B <br /> <br />Street Maintenance Program Assessment Practices <br /> <br />1, Projects are identified by individual subdivision, .01' by grouping of subdivision and lots <br />having similar pavement histories and conditions and similar pavement areas per benefited <br />uni t. < <br /> <br />2. An assessment share will be calculated by determining the total assessable cost of the <br />project and dividing by the nqmber of benefited units. <br /> <br />3. Where an individual lot has more than one frontage and not all frontages are scheduled to <br />receive an improvement or the same type of improvements, the lot will be considered <br />benefited and be assessed a full share for the improvement which is conducted along the <br />frontage of the lot that contains the main driveway opening. <br /> <br />4. For overlays the amount assessed to benefited property owner is 50% of the total project <br />cost including overhead costs. (1991) . <br /> <br />5. For sealcoats the assessment to benefited property owner shall be 43% of the total project <br />cost including overhead costs in program year 2008, and shall be reduced by 7% in each <br />successive year until reduced to an 8% assessment in program year 2013, After the 2013 <br />program there shall he no assessment for sealcoats. (2007) <br /> <br />6. Projects ,involving streets which have had previous proposed maintenance projects defeated <br />by petition shall be ineligible to receive the City's 50% contribution, if the project requires a . <br />more expensive maintenance (Le. streets proposed for sealcoating project which was <br />defeated by citizen petition now are proposed for a bituminous overlay). (1993) <br /> <br />7. Where the rule of dividing the assessable project cost by the number of benefited units (no. 2 <br />above) would result in an assessable share which is grossly out of proportions to the <br />assessable share being charged to similar lots receiving similar improvements, the City <br />. Council may elect to assess such lots the average assessable share being made to lots <br />receiving similar improvements for that project year. (1996) <br /> <br />8. Where a benefited area contains commercial lots having widely varying sizes, the <br />assessment shall be made based on area of the lot. (2003) <br /> <br />9. Where an individual lot has more than one frontage including a driveway frontage on a state <br />or county road, and a non-driveway frontage on a MSA or city street, one~half assessment <br />share will be made for an improvement to the MSA orCity street. (1995) <br /> <br />-25- <br />