Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Attachment G <br /> <br />would recommend a time limit of 12 months or until the end of 2006. Staffsconcem is to keep <br />this isslle on the front burner. <br /> <br />Ms. Frolik indicated the implementation of the access way is included as item no. 11, but it does <br />110t include a time limit. <br /> <br />Motion by Coullcilmember Cook, seconded by Councilmember Pearsoll,. to adopt Resolution <br />1/.05-09-337 adopting Findings of Fact #0742 relating to the request for an amended Conditional <br />{Jsc Permit for the Green Valley Greenhouse. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Councilmember Elvig expressed concern with thepossibilit)r of problems <br />resulting from individuals loading materials on a flat bed trailer. Ms. Frolik replied item no. 10 <br />rcqui res Green Valley Greenhouse to monitor the county road for spillage. Councilmember <br />Flvig stated materials being loaded improperly.on a flatbed would be a safety issue. He <br />suggested if this becomes a problem, a restriction regarding this issue could be added into the <br />conditional use permit in the future. Councilmember Pearson commented Mr. Rowe rims an <br />efficient business and monitors the loads well. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamee, Councilmembers Cook, Pearson, Elvig, Olson, and <br />Strommen. Voting No: None. Absent: Councilmember Jeffrey. <br /> <br />Motion by Council member Cook, seconded by Councilmember Olson, to adopt Resolution #05- <br />09-338 approving the request for an amendment to the Green Valley Greenhouse Conditional <br />l J se Perm it, based on the findings of fact, and declaring terms of same, with an amendmentto the <br />Conditional Use Permit to require that the emergency access plan be accomplished by the end of <br />calendar year 2006. <br /> <br />Motion carried. V oting Yes: Mayor Garnee, Councilmembers Cook, Olson, Elvig, Pearson, and <br />Strommen. Voting No: None. Absent: Councilmember Jeffrey. <br /> <br />Case #12: <br /> <br />Introduce Wetland Buffer Ordinance; Case of City of Ramsey <br /> <br />Mayor Ciamcc indicated the proposed Wetland Buffer Ordinance was discussed in a Council <br />work session. The Council listened to the concerns of citizens, and some of those concerns are <br />unique. At this time the action before the Council is introduction of the proposed ordinance. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Cook, seconded by Councilmember Strommen, to introduce the <br />proposed Wetland Buffer Ordinance. <br /> <br />Further discussion: John Enstrom, 8702 181st Avenue NW, stated he had a two hour meeting <br />with his engineer today regarding this issue. He would like to have tlus ordinance adjoumed <br />until the next Council meeting when he will have a full report for the Council's consideration. <br />He stated there are many things in this ordinance that are not legal. Mayor Gamec requested Mr. <br />I ~nstrol11 to submit a formal letter for the Council to review prior to the next Council meeting. <br />City Attorney Goodrich indicated the letter should be submitted by the Wednesday prior to the <br />Council meeting at 5:00 p.m. to be included in the Council packet. Mr. Enstrom stated there are <br /> <br />City Council I September 27, 2005 <br />Page 18 of 25 <br /> <br />56 <br />