Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Strornmen aye <br />Councilmember Kurak ' aye <br />Councilmember Cook aye <br />Councilmember Zimmerman aye <br />Councilmember Pearson aye <br />Councilmember Elvig aye <br />Mayor Gamec aye <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />Case #13: Report from Public Works Committee <br /> <br />The Personnel Committee met on June 17, 2003 to discuss the following cases: <br /> <br />1) Consider Reduction of Tiger Street Speed Limit <br />The Public Works Committee recommended that Tiger Street be declared a rural residential <br />district, that a resolution to that effect be passed and transmitted to the Commissioner of <br />Transportation, and that a 30 mph speed limit posting be erected ten days thereafter. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Zimmerman, seconded by Councilmember Cook, to ratify the <br />recommendation of the Public Works Committee. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, and Councilmembers Zimmerman, Cook, Elvig, <br />Kurak, Pearson, and Strommen. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />P86 <br /> <br />2) Installation of Sidewalk on 145th Lane and 146th Avenue <br />The Public Works Committee recommended that staff determine the appropriate trail fee that <br />should be charged to the developer and that those funds be used toward the installation of the <br />sidewalks and if there is a shortfall on funds that the remaining dollars come out of the City's <br />trail fund. The motion was amended to forward the issue to the Park Commission for their <br />recommendation. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski noted that the Park Commission made a recommendation that the City <br />should request that the developer assist in the construction of the sidewalk. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that it was a Council decision to eliminate the trail from the development <br />and therefore the funds should come from the trail fund. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak agreed, stating that the City and the developer have signed a <br />development agreement and within that agreement it indicates which fees the developer would <br />pay. She did not believe that it was appropriate for the City to go back on the development <br />agreement and request additional funds for a sidewalk outside of their development. <br /> <br />City Council/July 8, 2003 <br /> Page 26 of 30 <br /> <br /> <br />