My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 07/10/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 07/10/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 4:01:12 PM
Creation date
8/12/2003 3:35:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
07/10/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Van Scoy asked if the only reference to open space is on page 151, or if there is <br />other reference. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon stated there was not. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy indicated the reference to the guidelines has a reference to green space <br />for each development area. He asked if this is part of the design intent, is that enough of a <br />reference. <br /> <br />Consultant Gordon indicated there are two levels; the dedication to the City and the private <br />courtyard spaces. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy asked if they would look at both when they are approving a project. <br /> <br />Consultant Gordon stated they would. He indicated they talked about how to determine density <br />and adjust for shared open space. He stated they are trying to do it the way it is done today. He <br />continued his review, noting they are beefing up the parking language. He indicated for the <br />location of parking, they took out the requirement that the parking must be within 400 feet of the <br />use served. He noted there were some minor changes to the sign language. He pointed out on <br />page 163 they are taking out the public information meeting language, and noted how each <br />subdivision talks about the process. He indicated Subd. 11 is the savings clause, where they tried <br />to look at relationships with other city code sections and which sections will not work so they can <br />be excluded. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt indicated they took out the development guarantee from the prior section, and <br />asked what prompted it. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon stated it was redundant language, covered in Chapter 9.50, <br />Subdivision. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy asked if Staff would then know when to step out of the Town Center <br />process and move to the regular process. <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon indicated they would, but he believes the code guides that process. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Reeves to close the public <br />hearing at 9:23 p.m. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Johnson, Reeves, Brauer, <br />Shepherd, Van Scoy, and Watson. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer stated one thing that jumped out at him in the Development Guidelines is <br />the word 'should'. He asked if they would not prefer to say 'will'. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/July 10, 2003 <br /> Page 16 of 21 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.