Laserfiche WebLink
Public Hearing <br />Chairperson Nixt called the public hearing to order at 7:34 p.m. <br />Presentation <br />Environmental Coordinator Anderson presented the staff report. <br />Citizen Input <br />Chairperson Nixt read a letter from Commissio <br />Planning Commission meeting. The letter is attar <br />Merlin Hunt, 17860 Nowthen Blvd. NW. Mr. <br />protection ordinance is a taking of land because it <br />of a memo from Attorney Goodrich, included in t <br />the ordinance would affect his property. <br />Chairperson Nixt explained that the City <br />constitutional, however an individual ma <br />reasonable economic use of the property <br />Mr. Hunt shared an article from the A <br />Urged for the Wetland Consery <br />County Board. <br />— <br />nanagemen <br />ed his comment <br />that he feels a buff <br />fl :beneficial than iso <br />Mr. Hunt referred to a lett . <br />make their voices heard be o <br />Mr. Hunt re f ed.ack to the <br />pre -settle <br />Mr. H <br />was unable to attend the <br />e wetland <br />e read parts <br />p showing how <br />has said tha inance on it's face is <br />adverse at they are left with no <br />atory taking. <br />titled "No Changes are being <br />erred to the position of the Anoka <br />ditor where t ex ;:.5 r stated that citizens of Ramsey need to <br />few ruin the remaining natural resources left in the City. <br />pion article where it stated that the County has 70% of <br />s r o ' lands are not disappearing so fast. <br />ement o; W etlands on his property and stated that since he <br />e are mom :, diverse plants in the wetlands on his property. Mr. <br />ing that this is certainly a taking of his property rights, and <br />late humans from nature is wrong, that managing wetlands is <br />o paragraphs of the City Attorney memo of which Mr. Hunt <br />y opinion that the City Code subsection 9.26.06 subd. 9, is not <br />titutional, as all economically viable uses of the property will not <br />be taken as a resu plementation of the said subsection. With that said, however, it is <br />possible that a landowners case specific facts could demonstrate that a regulatory taking has <br />occurred and inverse condemnation should be ordered by the court. The factors the court will <br />consider in making such a determination are those referenced in the t o the regulation an the <br />Johns v. Mpls. Supra. Those factors are: The economic impact <br />referred. <br />categorically or <br />1 <br />Planning Commission /April 2, 2009 <br />Page 5of13 <br />