Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CASE # ~ <br /> <br />DISCUSSION OF STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN <br />ALPACA ESTATES FOR RAMSEY.COMMONS <br />By: Tim Rimmer, City Engineer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />The Ramsey Commons project was approved by CityCounci~ on May 13,2008. The project is located <br />at the northwest comer of Armstrong Boulevard and Riverdale Drive. It consists of a 7,800 square foot <br />mu1ti~tenant building, which includes a drive through for a US Bank. <br /> <br />The parcel description is Lot 1, Block 1 ALPACA ESTATES and is subject to the City'sstormwater <br />managemenfrequirements fgr developments. The property owner/developer also owns the p~operty <br />directly to the west, which is described as Lot 7, Block 1 ALPACA ESTATES 4TH ADDIrON. There is <br />an existing regional storm basin at the west end of Riverdale Drive that was created for the benefit of <br />ALPACA ESTATES 4TH ADDITON. As part of the site plan application the property ovvner decided to <br />split the regional ponding capacity equally between the two parcels that they own, therefore requiring <br />some on-site. stormwater ratl:) and quality control for each lot. <br /> <br />The idea was to develop Lot 1, Block 1. with a reduced on~site ponding requirement, and then duplicate <br />. the process for Lot 7, Block 1 when a proposal came forward in the future. The applicant would <br />construct the reduced on-site ponding required as part of the initial development, including a discharge <br />pipe down to the regional basin approximately 1000' to the west. There is existing storm sewer in <br />Riverdale Drive approximately 600' to the west but it is undersized to accommodate any additional <br />flow, therefore a separate pipe would be required to carry the discharge from their proposed on-site pond <br />to the regional basin. The applicant's initial design was to discharge water directly from their on-site <br />pond into the Riverdale Drive right-of~way and allow it to flow down the street to the existing storm <br />sewer causing additional ponding concerns on the roadway. <br /> <br />Observations: ,. <br /> <br />The case brought before Council at the time of approval outlined a process that the City was willing to <br />undertake to construct the storm sewer to accommodate the applicant's properties, as well as future <br />development along Riverdale Drive within ALPACA EST A TES 4TH ADDITION. The applicant was <br />going to construct a temporary basin on Lot 7, Block 14TH ADDITION to retain all the runoff from <br />both their sites until such time that the City installs a trunk storm sewer line along Riverdale Drive to the <br />regional basin. It was suggested that this might be accomplished in conjunction with the Armstrong <br />Boulevard improvements planned for 2009. The applicant would pay their stonnwater management fees <br />for both lots and deposit the estimated cost of the improvement in escrow as a funding mechanism to <br />justify the project. The City's obligation would be to pay for the cost of oversizing the pipe, and the <br />installation of other features necessary to serve the larger drainage area. These additional City costs <br />would be recouped through future stonnwater management fees from the undeveloped benefiting <br />parcels, and quarterly storm water utility charges. <br /> <br />The developer is now considering advancing the stonn sewer trunk installation as part of their <br />development project. It is estimated that the total project cost for this trunk line is approximately <br />$60,000, and the City oversizing cost is approximately $15,000. The property owner is requesting a <br />process to recoup some of their capital investment for this trunk line installation, with a potential <br />payback over time as others in the area develop and connect. <br /> <br />7 <br />