Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Public Hearing <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt called the public hearing to order at 7:34 p.m. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Environmental Coordinator Anderson presented the staff report. <br /> <br /> <br />Citizen Input <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt read a letter from Commissi <br />Planning Commission meeting. The letter is att <br /> <br />s unable to attend the <br /> <br />Merlin Hunt, 17860 Nowthen Blvq. NW. Mr. <br />protection ordinance is a taking of land because i <br />of a memo from Attorney Goodrich, included in t <br />the ordinance would affect his property. <br /> <br />e wetland <br />e read parts <br />showing how <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt explained that the City <br />constitutional, however an individual m <br />reasonable economic use of the prope <br /> <br />inance on it's face is <br /> <br />Mr. Hunt shared an article from the A <br />Urged for the Wetland Conserv N. <br />County Board. <br /> <br />titled "No Changes are being <br />ed to the position of the Anoka <br /> <br />'tor where t r stated that citizens of Ramsey need to <br />few ruin the remaining natural resources left in the City. <br />. on article where it stated that the County has 70% of <br />ands are not disappearing so fast. <br />tlands on his property and stated that since he <br />are mo iverse plants in the wetlands on his property. Mr. <br />ing that this is certainly a taking of his property rights, ~d <br />late humans from nature is wrong, that managing wetlands is <br /> <br />Chairpe 0 paragraphs of the City Attorney memo of which Mr. Hunt <br />referred. ' opinion that the City Code subsection 9.26.06 subd. 9, is not <br />categorically 0 titutional, as all economically viable uses of the property will not <br />be taken as a resu lementation of the said subsection. With that said, however, it is <br />possible that a lando r's case specific facts could demonstrate that a regulatory taking has <br />occurred and inverse condemnation should be ordered by the court. The factors the court will <br />consider in making such a determination are those referenced in the Johnson case cited above. <br />Johnson v. Mp/s. Supra." Those factors are: The economic impact of the regulation on the <br /> <br />Planning Commission/April 2, 2009 <br />Page 5 of 13 <br /> <br />-155- <br />