Laserfiche WebLink
<br />claimant, the extent to which the regulation has interfered with distinct investment-backed <br />expectations and the character ofth~ government regulations. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt explained that if the character of the government regulation was only <br />applicable to one or two landowners it would be more likely deemed unconstitutional, if it is <br />applicable to all similarly situated landowners, as this ordinance seems to be, the burden is much <br />higher for a landowner to show that the character of the government regulation constitutes a <br />taking. <br /> <br />Sarah Strommen, 14546 Krypton 8t NW. <br />This ordinance goes back to 2000-2001 <br />development was developed. Ther <br />Environmental Policy Board. . The task <br />on to the wetland buffer ordinance. <br />committed to studying the issue <br />vetted to that extent. They <br />District, and the Builders As <br /> <br /> <br />. gin of the ordinance. <br />acitize lative when The Ponds <br />established, which now is the <br />ation ordinance and moved <br />has not seen a group more <br />ng and has not seen an ordinance <br />m the DNR, Anoka Conservation <br /> <br />Robert Sibilski, 7240 166th Avenue NW. Mr. 8ibilski, in <br />clarified where his comments in his letter to the e c <br />as fact regarding the unconstitutionality of the 0 <br />in that this should have been looked at throug <br />community not at a public hearing. The City <br />works. The ordinance gives the developer an opp <br />looks at this as a way to protect our natural resour <br />opportunity to see if this ordinance works once de <br /> <br />ive. As ember of the Environment Policy Board, he brings <br />. Freeburg gave examples of newspaper articles that showed <br />copies of the articles if anyone is interested in reading them. <br /> <br />Jo <br />stated e <br />Federal Go <br />ordinance supe <br /> <br />NW. Mr. Engstrom is not in favor of the ordinance. He <br />atural buffer, trees, cattails, brush, open water. He stated the <br />date buffers if it was necessary. Mr. Engstrom stated that this <br />and federal ordinances. <br /> <br />ays the ordinance would affect development of properties. <br /> <br />Mr. Engstrom reiterated that wetlands have their natural buffer. <br /> <br />Planning Commission! April 2, 2009 <br />Page 6 of 13 <br /> <br />~156- <br />