My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/28/2009 - Board of Appeals
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2009
>
Agenda - Council - 04/28/2009 - Board of Appeals
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 3:58:16 PM
Creation date
4/23/2009 2:20:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Title
Board of Appeals
Document Date
04/28/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />very nicely. She understands the reluctance to try the first one, but she thinks it should be <br />utilized. <br /> <br />Councihnember Jeffrey indicated the roundabout and the boulevard median would be good <br />features for the development as long as they are maintained. <br /> <br />The Council and staff discussed maneuverability for snow plow and emergency vehicles in <br />relation to the cul-de-sac median. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook stated he would like to have the cul-de-sac median looked at closer. <br /> <br />COllnci I member Elvig concurred. <br /> <br />. Assistant Public Works Director Olson explained these issues do not need to be determined at <br />the time of preliminary plat. Staff can work through the design and bring it back at final plat. <br />He indicated there are a couple of other issues to address. Based on past experiences with <br />County officials, accesses onto County roads are eliminated as much as possible. The second <br />connection to Nowthen Boulevard may be an issue and could be turned into a cul-de-sac instead <br />or second access. <br /> <br />Councilmcmber Olson inquired about the distance between the two accesses onto Nowthen <br />Boulevard. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson replied the distance between the accesses would be <br />approximately 1/8 mik He indicated the last issue to discuss is the connection to l67th Avenue <br />via Marble Street recommended by staff. He explained generally everyone in this subdivision <br />will be traveling south and east. There currently are a number of accesses, one to 16th Avenue, <br />two to the existing neighborhood on the east, and two proposed on CR 5. The number of <br />households expected to utilize the proposed access to 167th Avenue is aPfroximately 260 <br />vehicles. This would be close to 500 trips per day that would utilize the l67t Avenue access, <br />rather than past existing homeowners going south on 167th A venue with the future realignment <br />of 16i" Avenue. The Planning Commission recommended against including the access. Staff <br />recommends including an outlot to allow for the access that would be released if the property to <br />the east develops and provides an alternative connection. <br /> <br />Council member Strommen requested clarification that the idea is to preserve the outlot for the <br />possibility of a future connection, and that there would not be a connection at the end of the <br />Ovcrtooms' driveway if they do not redevelop their property. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson responded in the affirmative. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig expressed concern with wrapping up this entire project, which has so <br />many facets to it, into another larger contingency of the east/west lateral, which is a much larger <br />conversation for the City overall. He suggested this contingency be removed from this <br />development, with action taken to keep the east/west lateral moving forward. <br /> <br />City Council! September 13, 2005 <br />Page 15 of 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.