Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Attachment F <br /> <br />. ty Engineer Jankowski indicated the remaining trail crossings ifi(..~"...v ".uv ~v.w n AnI:) ~.~- <br />10 'ons: CR 116/8Wlwood Dr; CR 116lRhinestone 8t; CR 116/Town Center Dr; <br />1161 olite St; CR 56/E. Ramsey Pkwy; CR 57/SWlwood Dr; CR 57/153Td La; CR 57/8 urn <br />St; CS 5/Alpine Dr. Mr. Jankowski advised there are also a number of locations w re the <br />City's pro osed trail system will cross COWlty highways at locations other than at in ections. <br />The listing these locations is as follows: C8AH S/CD #3; CSAH 5/Trott Broo , CR 56/CD <br />#3; CR S6/Ti d Park; CR 83/Trott Brook; CR 83/Power line nlo 176th Ave. . Jankowski <br />advised the cost placing pavement markings, pedestrian crossing and ance pedestrian <br />crossing signs woul e $1,100 per crossing. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook re ested clarification that the City requests <br />determines whether the w ts are met. <br /> <br /> <br />the County will likely w e City to look at trying to avoid <br />entually there will be 118 throughout the City with potential <br />developed with c ssings a part of required improvements <br /> <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski advis <br />the proliferation of crosswalks. <br />crossings. He suggested a plan b <br />with developments. <br /> <br />Chairperson Elvig questioned the effecti <br />sees drivers that always stop at a cros <br />crosswalks. It is almost dangerous to <br />when the motorists do not. <br /> <br />e of the crosswalks. He noted in some states he <br />, but. in Minnesota traffic does not stop for <br />the rosswalks in and expect people to abide by it <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski indicate 's is why the cros alks should be used sparingly. <br /> <br />Chairperson Elvig <br />presented to the P <br /> <br /> <br />ggested a comprehensive <br />Board for review. <br /> <br /> <br />locations be <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook stres the need to consider pede . an underpasses at trail crossings <br />located at high traffic are . He suggested the Park Board wet in on this topic. <br /> <br />The Commi e discussed possible locations for pedestrian underpasses. . <br /> <br />Conse s of the Committee was to direct staff to draft a comprehensive <br />.. h': '~~'_'__-_' 'W:-:-'!l:' _ _, (11--'_ ~-:!<',-~~<:" ~__:. > __.:.',:'-~ <br />loca' ns for .', ::' '....~,.I :",.;; ,,", '",~H ,', to be presented to the P <br />re ew prior to further discussion by the Public Works Committee. <br /> <br />COMMITTEE INPUT <br /> <br />Discuss 167th MSA Alignment <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski indicated when the Brookfield subdivision was platted there was a <br />decision made to route the 167th Avenue collector street to the south with a general alignment <br />that was thought to be feasible. Mr. Peterson of Oakwood Land Development has property <br />rights to a couple of the properties that are needed for the alignment; there is a total of four <br />parcels that require acquisition for the road alignment. Mr. Jankowski presented a map depicting <br /> <br />Public Works Committee 1 October 17, 2006 <br />Page 8 of 11 <br />