Agenda - Council - 04/28/2009 - Board of Appeals

Home

has made a good faith effort to promote the southern route and that should be part of the discussion of this development. The Council has not taken action to change that preferred route. Council member Strommen noted Mr. Overtoom's concern that the current Comprehensive Plan shows the east/west corridor going through this plat. She suggested the Council state their intention for the record of looking at an alternative alignment and going forward with the southern route. Councilmcmber Cook called for the vote. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Cook, Olson, Elvig, Jeffrey, Pearson, and Strommen. Voting No: None. Motion by Councilmember Cook, seconded by Councilmember Elvig, that the preferred route of 16ih ^ venue be the southern alignment discussed at the recent Council work session, and that the preferred route be taken forward in planning for the Comprehensive Plan. Further'discussion: Mr. Overtoom expressed concern with the possible diagonal street coming down from inside of the development across the northeast comer of his property, as the traffic issues that may be generated with that T intersection in the middle of that curve would be a dangerolls intersection. Community Development Director Trudgeon explained the direction has been given to follow the southern alignment, but the alignment that was presented at the work session was not precise. Assistant Public Works Director Olson requested clarification whether the intent is to construct the segment of 1671h Avenue out to CR 5 at the time of final plat. He noted if this is not done all of the traffic will be pushed through two 90-degree turns. Couneilmember Elvig stressed the need to extend 167th Avenue to CR 5 as soon as possible to mitigate traffic issues. He noted this is included in the Capital Improvement Plan and the Comprehensive Plan. This road is identified as an MSA street in the City's plans, which will require certain angle and speed capabilities. Mayor Gamec suggested staff begin talking to residents in this area regarding the plans for the street extension, Mr, Peterson indicated Oakwood Land Development has been aggressively working on this southern alignment. Their engineers have worked under the understanding that this route is only a proposal. Oakwood Land Development has purchased two of the three parcels necessary for this leg of the route, and has suggested to staff and the Council that they will give the right-of-way to the City at no cost. ) Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamee, Councilmembers Cook, Elvig, Jeffrey, Olson, Pearson, and Strommen. Voting No: None. Consider Ordinance to Amend Section 9.20~11 {R-1 Residential ' Code; Case of City of Ramsey VIewed that in July of 2005, Ordinance #05-12 amended the R-l Bulk Stan uring dment process, the Rural Developing Bulk Standards erroneo erted back to the old standal1 e ard to lot size, lot width, and as drafted an ordinance that will correct the lot SIze, . dth, and setbacks for tbe ural Developing Bulk Standards, Staff also notices that wne -1 Rural Developing bulk standards were amended to require lot clustering, the maximum n f City Council I September 13, 2005 Page 17 of 33