Laserfiche WebLink
aircraft in 1979 -1980; the lowest number of based aircraft was 12 -14 a <br />counie of years ago. The existing facility lies on the easterly portion of <br />120 acres of industrial property; to the north is residential development; <br />the landfill is to the northeast; urban residential development is to the <br />east; and commerical property to the south along Hwy. #10. Fran a land use <br />eavatibility standpoint, the type of facility planned looks good except <br />for the landfill. Landfills are generally regarded as incompatible with <br />airports. The existing facility has 2 landing strips with the prima <br />runty in a northwest /southeast direction and the crosswind runway in primary <br />direction. The crosswind runway would be abandoned. It is <br />Proposed for the facility to have a 3300' basic utility paved runway that <br />would serve single and light twin engine aircraft under 12,000 pounds in <br />weight. The proposal would require relocation of Comty Rd. #116, airport <br />building area improvements and obstruction removals (trees, power lines). <br />There are two aspects to airport zoning — height limitations and land use <br />safety zoning. Height and land use zoning results in an ordinance geared <br />towards protecting property, people, aircraft and businesses close to <br />airports. There are several advantages to adopting airport zoning, one of <br />which is that it would prohibit certain types of uses incompatible with <br />airports and certain development from oecuring. This particular hearing is <br />the first of two to be held on the proposed zoning ordinance. This hearing <br />is to present the basics of what is contained in the ordinance and receive <br />comments. m►ents. There will be a 10 day period following the hearing in which <br />written earnents regarding the ordinance will be received. Those comments <br />will be considered and appropriate revisions to the ordinance will be made. <br />The ordinance would then be resubmitted to the City and M/DoT Aeronautics <br />Division for review. Upon approval by the Aeronautics Division <br />Commissioner, Council will set a second public bearing date. At that <br />second hearing, the City will present the final ordinance draft intended <br />for adoption. If no further changes are made to the ordinance at that <br />hearings the City can adopt the ordinance. If there are changes resulting <br />f rom the second hearing, the ordinance would be sent back to MN DoT <br />Aeronautics Division for another approval prior to City adoption of it. <br />Mr. Otto proceeded to explain height limitations which are best described <br />as imaginary surfaces in a bowl -like configuration. The primary zone is a <br />surface extending 200' feet beyond the ends of the ruway and 250' from the <br />centerline of the runway on each side; no elevation in that primary surface <br />will be higher than the runway. From that primary zone extends the <br />approach zone surface which inclines upward at a slope of 40:1. The <br />horizontal zone is all that land which lies directly under an imaginary <br />horizontal surface 150' above the airport elevation or 1020 and <br />encompasses an area 6200' from the ends of the runway pavement. The <br />conical zone is that surface extending upward and outward from the <br />horizontal surface at a slope of 20 :1 for a distance of 4 feet. The <br />transitional zone is that surface extending upward and outward at a <br />slope of 7 :1 from the sides of the primary and approach surfaces. <br />Generally, a 150' height restriction is not a major concern of residents. <br />Height limitations impact radio towers, t.v. antennas, water towers, <br />landfills, etc. The most significant restrictions to residents occur <br />closer in to the approaches which rise at a slope of 40 :1; 2000' from <br />runwaynend there would be a 50' height restriction, etc. <br />Airport Zoning Board/March 11, 1987 <br />Page 2 of 12 <br />