Laserfiche WebLink
<br />the imorovements are in, that could not happen unless Bwy. 10 were moved <br />and ii'i s very unlikely that would ever be approved. <br /> <br />Mrs. Rick asked why the airport coul&1' t be located in an area that would <br />all~ for expansion. <br /> <br />CanmissiCl'ler Sieber stated that Gateway is an existing airport which gives <br />it an OWOrtunity to be considered by the Federal government. Previous <br />city consideratiCl'l to other sites raised a lot of citizen owosition. 'l'he <br />only site that has not raised much owositiCl'l is the existing Gateway site. <br /> <br />APPROVAL (F Ac.:F.linA <br /> <br />Canmission consensus was to approve the agenda with the folladng addition: <br /> <br />Case '2: Report On Meeting With Waste Management Of Minnesota, Inc. <br /> <br />APPROVE AIRPORl' <X>>fiSSlOO MEETIr<<; MINUTES <br /> <br />It>tiCl'l by Camdssioner Erickson and seconded by CUmdssioner Greenberg to <br />awrove regular Airport CamnissiCl'l meeting minutes dated December 3, 1986. <br /> <br />It>tiCl'l carried. Voting Yes: Olainnan lweI, Ccmnissioners Barnes, Emery, <br />Greenberg, Donovan, Sieber, Chapnan and Erickson. Voting No: None. <br />H>sent: C'nym;ssioner Stauffer. <br /> <br />CDt1MISSION HJSINESS <br /> <br />{"ARe 12: awort Ql Meeting Meetin9 With Waste Management Of Minnesoto.. <br />.Iwa. <br /> <br />Olainnan lweI stated that upon their request, he and Herland otto met with <br />representatives of Waste Management, Inc. regarding the incanpatibility of <br />landfills and airports. Waste Management was infoDDed that in~tibility <br />is based on landfill vertical expansion encroaching conicle airspace and <br />landfills being a bird attractiCl'l causing a safety factor for the airport. <br />Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc. indicated that they are willing to work <br />with the city to see that these concerns are resolved. <br /> <br />{"ARe II: AiJ:.POrt Zon~: <br /> <br />Herland Otto stated that the purpose of airport zoning is to protect <br />airport awroaches fran further developnent. Also, in order to canply with <br />State criteria and be eligible for funding, airports owners must have a <br />zoning ordinance adopted or be in the process of developing one. Because <br />Ramsey does not alrrentlyam the airport, they can't establish a jOint <br />airport zoning board with other affected agencies; because the airport is <br />within Ramsey boundaries, the City has the option to adopt a zoning <br />ordinance for the City itself and request adjacent community affected by <br />height limitatiCllS to adopt a similar zoning ordinance. Mr. Otto proceeded <br />to review, with the Camli.ssion, the proposed zoning ordinance which was <br />prep:lred using FAA's model ordinance as a guideline. Mr. otto recommended <br />deviating fran the model ordinance in the following ways: <br />Airport/January 14, 1987 <br /> <br />Page3 of 5 <br />