Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Subject: Editorial <br />Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:28:54 -0500 <br />From: Matt Look <Iooksigns@gmail.com> <br />To: joe@mcdilda.com <br /> <br />Joe: <br /> <br />Your em ail forwarding of Mr. Sibilski's Letter to the editor, is more than likely going to have a <br />negative effect on what you are trying to get accomplished, fhat being the preservation of the <br />wetland buffering ordinance. <br />For your information, right-of-way is purchased, which is the same argument that Mayor <br />Ramsey is advocating for. If sound science calls for wetland buffers, then the city needs to <br />acquire that land, in lieu of ordinancing the land out from under people. <br />On a board preservation note, this board was formed out of special interest. For Mr. Sibilski to <br />make the accusation that Mayor Ramsey is responding only to special interest is laughable. <br />On a disrespectful note, I have never experienced disrespect from any other board than this <br />one. Mr. Sibilski finds it acceptable to speak poorly of our current Mayor as he found it <br />necessary to address me disrespectfully during the Natural Resource inventory vote. <br />All boards/commissions serve at the "pleasure" of the council. They provide an advisory role <br />only so long as necessary. The EDA have statutory protection....the Environmental Policy Board <br />does not. <br />Use Caution <br /> <br />Matt Look <br />Look Signs Inc. <br />612.558.9111 <br />