My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/12/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2009
>
Agenda - Council - 05/12/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 3:59:02 PM
Creation date
5/7/2009 1:05:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/12/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
291
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CASE #~ <br />DISCUSSION OF STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN <br />ALPACA ESTATES FOR RAMSEY COMMONS <br />By: Tim Himmer, City Engineer <br />Background: <br />The Ramsey Commons project was approved by City Council on May 13, 2008. The project is located. <br />at the northwest corner of Armstrong Boulevard and Riverdale Drive. It consists of a 7,800 square foot <br />multi-tenant building, which includes a drive through for a US Bank. <br />The parcel description is Lot 1, Block 1 ALPACA ESTATES and is subject to the City's stormwater <br />management requirements for developments. The property owner/developer also owns the property <br />directly to the west, which is described as Lot 7, Block 1 ALPACA ESTATES 4TH ADDITON. There is <br />an existing regional storm basin at the west end of Riverdale Drive that was created for the benefit of <br />ALPACA ESTATES 4TH ADDITON. As part of the site plan application the property owner decided to <br />split the regional ponding capacity equally between the two parcels that they own, therefore requiring <br />some on-site stormwater rate and quality control for each lot. <br />The idea was to develop Lot 1, Block 1 with a reduced on-site ponding requirement, and then duplicate <br />the process for Lot 7, Block 1 when a proposal came forward in the future. The applicant would <br />......construct the reduced on-site ponding required as.part of. the initial development, _including a discharge, <br />__~__ <br />pipe down to the regional basin approximately 1000' to the west. There is existing storm sewer in <br />.Riverdale Drive approximately 600' to the west but it is undersized to accommodate any additional <br />flow, therefore a separate pipe would be required to carry the discharge from their proposed on-site pond <br />to the regional basin. The applicant's initial design was to discharge water directly from their on-site <br />pond into the Riverdale Drive right-of--way and allow it to flow down the street to the existing storm <br />sewer causing additional ponding concerns on the roadway. <br />Observations: <br />The case brought before Council at the time of approval outlined a process that the City was willing to <br />undertake to construct the storm sewer to accommodate the applicant's properties, as well as future <br />development along Riverdale Drive within ALPACA ESTATES 4TH ADDITION. The applicant was <br />going to construct a temporary basin on Lot 7, Block 1 4TH ADDITION to retain all the runoff from <br />both their sites until such time that the City installs a trunk storm sewer line along Riverdale Drive to the <br />regional basin. It was suggested that this might be accomplished in conjunction with the Armstrong <br />Boulevard improvements planned for 2009. The applicant would pay their stormwater management fees <br />for both lots and deposit the estimated cost of the improvement in escrow as a funding mechanism to <br />justify the project. The City's obligation would be to pay for the cost of oversizing the pipe, and the <br />installation of other features necessary to serve the larger drainage area. These additional City costs <br />would be recouped through future stormwater management fees from the undeveloped benefiting <br />parcels, and quarterly stormwater utility charges. <br />The developer is now considering advancing the storm sewer trunk installation as part of their <br />development project. It is estimated that the total project cost for this trunk line is approximately <br />$60,000, and the City oversizing cost is approximately $15,000. The property owner is requesting a <br />process to recoup some of their capital investment for this trunk line installation, with a potential <br />payback over time as others in the area develop and connect. <br />-135- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.