My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/12/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2009
>
Agenda - Council - 05/12/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 3:59:02 PM
Creation date
5/7/2009 1:05:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/12/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
291
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In order to test the Task Force assumption and to determine the proper speed, the <br />Task Force suggested, and Mn/DOT conducted, a number of speed studies on <br />representative Rural Residential District roadways, The individual roadway studies <br />exhibited a broad range of average and 8Sth percentile speeds.. These data were <br />further examined with the understanding that for the sake of uniformity the intent was <br />to establish a single statutory speed for the entire categoiy of rural residential roads. <br />Also, a major consideration was that the selected speed be appropriate and safe in the <br />densest of the rural residential areas. Based an these analyses, the recommended <br />statutory speed limit for all rural residential roadways should be 3S MPH. As with <br />other roadway types, if that statutory speed does not appear reasonable for a specific <br />condition, the-road authority may request a speed study. <br />If the 3S MPH Rural Residential speed limit were to be adopted, it was the view of <br />the Task Force that it would need to be signed. Since it is a different value than the <br />Urban District speed limit, it could not be covered in a blanket statement addressing <br />all statutory 30 MPH zones. Similarly, it was thought that it would not be practical to <br />expect motorists to distinguish a Rural Residential zone, end to know that the <br />statutory speed limit is 3S, if sigaauig of the 3S MPH area were not provided. <br />Aii option was considered that required the road authority to adopt the 35 MPH zone <br />for the Rural Residential District (and post appropriate signing). In this option,~a <br />Rural Residential District road would have to be adopted by a formal process, so only <br />roads that really needed the speed control could be selected. If not selected, a road <br />would remain at a statutory SS MPH limit or could be addressed through a speed <br />zoning study request. Task Force members felt strongly that this option deviated <br />from the core principle of uniformity and consistency statewide.. Placing an optional <br />decision in the authority of the local governments suggests that interpretation and <br />application of the Rural Residential District could vary from city to city. This option <br />did not advance'beyond initial discussions within the Task Force. <br />4.2.2 Recommended Statute Text <br />The Task Force recommends adding provision Subd. 2(a)(8) to the speed limit <br />statute: <br />($) 3S miles per houx in a Rural Residential District and speed limit signs shall be <br />erected upon entering the Rural Residential District. <br />Page 23 <br />-178- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.