Laserfiche WebLink
CASE # S <br />INTRODUCE ORDINANCE TO AMEND CITY CODE 9.11 (PERFORMANCE STANDARDS) & <br />9.12 (SIGNS) TO REQUIItE HEIGHT, SETBACK, AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS FOR <br />FLAG POLES. <br />By: AI Haugen, Management Intern <br />Background: <br />Flag regulations in Ramsey City Code Sections 9.11 (Performance Standards) and 9.12 (Signs) are <br />currently in conflict with respect to height limitations. In order to rectify the situation, one of these <br />sections must be amended. On February 5, 2009 the Planning Commission discussed this topic and <br />requested information on how other cities regulate flags, and reconsidered this issue on March 5`", 2009. <br />Notification: <br />The Public Hearing to consider amendments to Chapter 9.11 (Performance Standards) and to Chapter <br />9.12 (Signs) was properly advertised in the official City newspaper. <br />Observations: <br />Currently, City Code Section 9.12.03 Subd. 11 (Flags), restricts flag pole height to twenty-five.(25) feet. <br />However, City Code Section 9.11.11 (Permitted Encroachments) specifically excludes flag poles from <br />any height or setback restrictions. <br />Staff believes that footings for any flag-pole should be subject to inspection priorto installation. Staff has <br />included desirable elements of flag regulations from the codes of other cities. This ordinance will: <br />• Limit the height of flag-poles .to the maximum building height of the underlying zoning district, <br />or forty (40) feet high, whichever is less. <br />o Based on Planning Commission discussion on 02.05.09. <br />• Require that flag-pole footings are reviewed and issued a building permit. <br />o Based on staff concern for public safety. <br />• Require a setback equal to the height of the flag-pole without footings, or ten feet with footings. <br />o Based on staff concern for public safety. <br />• Prevent flags from covering more than fifty-percent (50%) of a flag-pole. <br />o Based on Planning Commission discussion on 03.05.09. <br />o Intended to prevent .flags from draping too low to the ground. <br />On March 5"' the. Planning Commission discussed alternative means to restrict the size of flags. The <br />Commission was more supportive of limit on the total area of flags, than a limit on the length or number <br />of flags. Flag regulations from some nearby cities are summarized in attachment A. <br />Funding Source: <br />All costs associated with processing the City Code amendments are handled through normal staff duties. <br />