My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 07/21/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2000 - 2009
>
2009
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 07/21/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 9:34:13 AM
Creation date
7/20/2009 9:46:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
07/21/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />CASE # 5 <br /> <br />CONSIDER ACQUISITION OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1 PINEVIEW ESTATES 2ND ADDITION <br />By: Tim Rimmer, City Engineer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />The property owner has approached the City to discuss acquisition of Lot 1, BlockTP!NEVlEW <br />ESTATES 2ND ADDITION. The vacant parcel is contained withinthe corridorfora.futuren.orth~south <br />road connecting the Town Center to Variolite Street. The property is 2.2 acresinsize, and is currently <br />zoned PUD for the ability to have a business located on a residentialparcel(1iye~work}. <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br /> <br />The.property owner is considering marketing the property and is wondering whether the City would like <br />to entertain a purchase agreement prior to it changing hands and potentially having improvements built <br />on the site. Staff is looking for direction on whether we should advance discussions with the resident at <br />this time. The future roadway alignment is currently shown in the ComprehehsivePlan, but there is no <br />time table for acquisition or construction within the 5 year CIP. A couple of factors to consider: ~ <br /> <br />. If acquired prior to being developed there would be no mark up from an unimproved condition or <br />potential relocation costs if a business were to be operating on the site. <br />. The timing of the proposed improvements and.funding source for the purchase. <br />. To what degree do we advance discussions (appraisal, negotiations, etc.)? <br /> <br />Staff is looking for direction on how best to handle this property owner request. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Staff is recommending cursory discussions with the property owner on areasoriable value for the land <br />acquisition. <br /> <br />Action: <br />Based upon discussion <br /> <br /> <br />PW: 7/21/09 <br /> <br /> <br />Attachments: <br />Location Map <br /> <br />Reviewed By: <br />Director of Public Works/Principal City Engineer <br /> <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.