Laserfiche WebLink
<br />the elements ofthe town's image, and an <br />explanation of hovv the proposed structure <br />contributes to that image. Otherwise, these are <br />highly subjective criteria that can easily lead to <br />inconsistent and unfair results. <br /> <br />Alternative language: "The proposed building <br />and landscape plans are consistent with the <br />catalogue ~amples ofacceptable styles, <br />elements, materials, massing, detailing, <br />landscaping, and relationsrips to street <br />frontages and abutting properties and does <br />not include the unacceptable examples in the <br />catalogue." <br /> <br />(2) The plan for the proposed buiiding or <br />structure indicates the manner in which the <br />structures are reasonably protected against <br />external and internal noise, vibrations, and <br />other factors that may tend to make the. <br />environment less desirable. <br /> <br />Comment: Noise and vibrations can be <br />determined with engineering data, but "other <br />factors" is open-ended. What or whose <br />environment is made lessdesirable with <br />respect to what and to whom? What is the <br />standard of a less desirable environment? <br /> <br />Alternative language: "The design ofthe <br />proposed building or structures includes <br />structural features that will prevent vibrations <br />or noise from sources intemalto the structure <br />from being detected at the property lines in <br />violation of town code stan'dards." <br /> <br />C3J The proposed building or structure is not, in <br />its exterior design and appearance, of inferior <br />quality such as to cause the nature of the <br />local environment to materiafiy depreciate in <br />appearance and value. <br /> <br />Comment: The criterion requires a definition <br />of ' 'local environment" and baseline data that <br />establish the "appearance" and "the value" <br />of that local environment. Evidel1<Ce must be <br />presented of how the proposed structure would <br />materiatly depreciate the baseline appearance <br />and value. This requires design and market <br />value expertise. <br /> <br />Alternative language: ''The proposed building <br />facade materials are not of such inferior quality <br />that they would be expected under normal <br />weather conditions to go into a state of disrepair <br />substantially sooner than the facade materials <br />onthe majority of the other buildings in the <br />same block ofthe street on which they front." <br /> <br />(4) The proposed building or structure is in <br />harmony with the proposed developments <br /> <br />166 <br /> <br />on land in the general area, with the <br />comprehensive plan for the town, and with <br />any precise plans adopted pursuant to the <br />comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />Comment: What does "in harmony" mean, <br />. and what are the elements of harmony or <br />disharmony? This is a highly subjective criterion. <br /> <br />Alternative.language: "The proposed building <br />is consistent with any area or neighborhood <br />plans adopted as part of the Comprehensive <br />Plan or Zoning Code." <br /> <br />(5) The proposed building or structure is not <br />excessively similar to any other structure existing <br />or for which a permit has been issued or to any <br />other structure included in the same permit <br />application within 200 feet of the proposed <br />site in respect to one or more of the fofiowing <br />features of exterior design and appearance: <br />a. Apparently visibly identical front or side <br />elevations <br />b. Substantiafiy identical size and <br />arrangement of either doors, windows, <br />porticas, or other openings or breaks in the <br />elevation facing the street, including reverse <br />arrangement or <br /> <br />deck line. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MANSARD <br /> <br />HIP <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />GAMBREL <br /> <br />GABLE <br /> <br />Alternative language: If a catalogue of accept- <br />able and unacceptable styles, elements, materi- <br />als, massing, detailing, landscaping, and rela- <br />tionships to street frontages and abutting}lroper- <br />ties is adopted, then criterion (6) below regarding <br />dissimilarity is not necessary. However, concerns <br />for too much similarity could still be valid; if so, <br />criterion (s) could be recast to read as follows: <br />"'The proposed building is not identical with any <br />other building in the block ofthe street on which <br />it fronts with regard to mass, the arrangement, <br />including the reverse arrangement, of massing. <br />elements, the size, style, and arrangement of <br />windows or doors, orthe height and length qf <br />roof elements facing the front street." <br /> <br />(6) The p~opased building or structure is not <br />excessively dissimilar in relation to any other <br />structure existing or for which a permit has <br />been issued OTto any other structure included <br />in the same permit application within 200 feet <br />of the proposed site in respect to one or mare; <br />of the following features: <br />a. Height of building or height of roof <br />b. Othersigni{icant design features includ- <br />ing, but not limited to, materials or quality of <br />architectural design <br /> <br /> <br />@ Parker, Colorado, uses <br />simple line drawings to <br />communicate ideas about <br />building mass, form, and <br />variation. The drawings <br />pictured here illustrate <br />variation in roof type. <br /> <br />FLAT <br /> <br /> <br />SHED <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />c. Other s.ignificant identical features of <br />design such as, but not limited to, material, <br />roof line, and height of other design <br />elements <br /> <br />Comment: The specified features are <br />discemable, butthe standard for <br />"excessively" is totally lacking. Subsection c <br />would allow a structure to be denied because <br />it uses stucco if its neighbor does, or if it has <br />the same height to the peak of the roof as a <br />structure located two orthree lots away. <br /> <br />ZONINGPRACTICE 7.09 <br />AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION lpage 4 <br />