My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/25/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2009
>
Agenda - Council - 08/25/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 4:18:31 PM
Creation date
8/20/2009 1:34:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/25/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
347
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0�1 <br />CONNECTING & INNOVATING <br />LEAGUE o> <br />MINNESOTA SINCE 1913 <br />CITIES <br />RISK MANAGEMENT INFORMATION <br />ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS <br />BETWEEN COUNCIL MEMBERS <br />E-mail correspondence can be an unintentional conduit for city officials to violate the Minnesota <br />Open Meeting Law. This memo outlines some points elected officials and members of city <br />committees and boards should be aware of to avoid inadvertently violating the Open Meeting Law. <br />The Open Meeting Law <br />Under the Minnesota Open Meeting Law, Minn. Stat. § 13D, meetings of at least a quorum of the <br />city council or one of its committees to discuss city business must be publicized and open to the <br />public, subject to a few exceptions. A primary purpose of the law is to make sure information and <br />deliberations about city business are available to the public. <br />The law applies to any discussion about city business, not just voting or official actions, and to any <br />gathering of a quorum of the council or committee. In most cities a quorum is three or more <br />council or committee. members. <br />It's easy to imagine situations where a quorum might gather — coffee at the local cafe, pre- or post - <br />meeting discussions, a wedding reception or community celebration are all common spots for <br />councilmembers to meet. There are also some not -so -obvious ways a quorum might meet, for <br />instance in a serial meeting — imagine Council Member A talks to Council Member B, B talks to <br />Council Member C, and C talks to A. Another is through written correspondence, or through <br />telephone conference calls. Any of these scenarios would create an open meeting concern if the <br />group discussed city business. <br />Violating the open meeting law carries with it penalties including personal liability for up to $300 <br />per occurrence and forfeiture of office for officials who intentionally violate the law three times. <br />Reasonable costs and attorney fees can also be awarded if the court finds specific intent to violate <br />the law. <br />Electronic communications and the Open Meeting Law <br />The Minnesota Open Meeting Law has a number of tricky aspects, not the least of which results <br />from increasing reliance on e-mail communication between council or committee members. <br />E-mail makes a serial meeting .easier by allowing council or committee members to forward <br />messages from one person to the next. Imagine one Council Member e -mailing another to suggest <br />the pros and cons of a particular city decision. The recipient forwards the e-mail to another <br />This material is provided as general information and is not a substitute for legal advice. <br />Consult your attorney for advice concerning specific situations. <br />LEAGUE OF MINNESOTAT 7CITIES 145 UNIVERSITY AVE. WEST PxoNE: (651) 281-1200 FAx: (651) 281-1298 <br />INSURANCE TRUST ST. PAUL, MN 55103-2044 TOLL FREE: (800) 925-1122 WEB: WWW.LMC.ORG <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.