My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/08/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2009
>
Agenda - Council - 09/08/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 4:20:13 PM
Creation date
9/3/2009 2:31:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/08/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. Environmental Aspects - Both materials cite the use of waste byproducts in their <br />manufacture. Concrete often incorporates fly ash. Asphalt can employ the use of roofing <br />shingles. <br /> <br />. Maintenance Aspects ~ If areas on concrete streets begin to fail they still need to be <br />patched or replaced. Bituminous patches to concrete streets result lt1 bad aesthetics and <br />rideability. Replacing concrete panels is more expensive and could resulLin a patchwork <br />appearance of varying color. Underground repairs on bituminous roads. could be <br />completed and open to traffic the same day. Concrete pavements usually l'equirelarger <br />removal areas to accommodate the repair to underground utilities, and the curing time of <br />the patch requires a longer inconvenience for the traveling public. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Staff concurs with pavement experts that there is 110 clear cut answer to the question of which <br />material is better. Each material offers of number of adv,antages and disadvantages enumerated <br />above. A case could be made for either material dependin.g on construction time frame, expected <br />life span, traffic loads and volumes, and initial construction budgets. Staff xel;ommends <br />remaining vigilant for opportunities to utilize concrete as an alternate bid whenever market <br />conditions between the two materials are competitive. <br /> <br />Action: <br /> <br />This item is for informational purposes and discussion. <br /> <br />Reviewed By: <br /> <br />City Engineer <br />Director of Public Works / Principal City Engineel' <br />Street Superintendant <br />Iq <br />PW:08/)f'/09 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.