My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/08/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2009
>
Agenda - Council - 09/08/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 4:20:13 PM
Creation date
9/3/2009 2:31:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/08/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />CASE # 5 <br /> <br />CONSIDERATIONS OF CONCRETE VERSUS ASPHALT PAVEMENTS <br />By: Stcye Jankowski, Assistant City Engineer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />The Council has inquired about the potential use of concrete :[01' the construction of City streets. <br />Staff reported on this topic at the July 15, 2008 Public Works Committee meeting. The primary <br />element in the debate between the use of these two paving materials centers on which is cheaper. <br />Last year staff reported that in general terms the initial cost to construct a concrete street wass <br />approximately 50% - 100% more than asphalt. However Minneapolis had bid a downtown street <br />project last year when asphalt prices were at their peak tmd received a concrete bid within 5% of <br />asphalt. However, since thattime asphalt prices have declined making it more price competitive <br />again. To stay current on this topic staff has reqllested a cost comparison for the construction of <br />one mile of residential street constructed with both our standard asphalt pavement (32 feet wide <br />. from face of curb to face of curb, 1.5 inches bituminous wear, 2 inches bituminolls base, and 4 <br />inches of class 5) and an equivalent concrete pavement. This analysis had not been completed at <br />the time of this agenda preparation but will be available at the meeting. <br /> <br />Factors other than initial cost <br />Below is a listing the some of the nomnonetary factors which are typically cited when comparing <br />these two paving materials: <br /> <br />. Durability. Concrete streets typically have a design life of 40 years, whereas bituminous <br />is approximately 30 years. When concrete streets are constructed they generally donlt <br />require maintenance other than some minor rehab/joint sealing every 12 ~ 15 years. It is <br />possible that the road wouldn't need to be resurfaced for the entire design life, or beyond. <br />As you are probably aware from our existing street maintenance program, bituminous <br />street~ require routine maintenance far n101'e frequently; (;rack sealing and seal coating <br />every 5to 7 years and overlays every 15 to 20 years. <br /> <br />. Noisepotential- In a municipal environment the noise level coming off a pavement is a <br />consideration. Asphalt pavements have a smoother surface initially and are qllieter. <br />However as asphalt pavement ages and deteriorates it can exceed the noise level of <br />concrete which is relatively constant throughout its service life. <br /> <br />. Temperature Considerations - Concrete pavement is lighter in color and better reilects <br />the sun. As a result it is a cooler pavernent. This is cOl'lsidered an environmental plus in <br />terms of combating environmental warming. However, asphalt pavements tend to absorb <br />the sun in the winter and achieves bare pavement quicker following snowfall events. <br /> <br />, . Light Reflection - Concrete is lighter and more reflective making street lighting more <br />effective. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.