Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Councilmember Dehen asked if there is any potential liability if the City does not proceed with <br />the partial acquisition. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated it appears that there is not a written agreement in place and thus, <br />there is no valid cause of action. <br /> <br />The Council discussed the history of this project and the site plan review undertaken by the City. <br />Public Works Director Olson stated that staff has engaged the property owner about possibly <br />relocating but the property owner has indicated he is unable to do so. <br /> <br />Coupcilmember Look stated that case #3 was an amendment to the cost-sharing agreement with <br />ACRRA for the final design of the rail station. He indicated the City Council previously <br />authorized an additional $150,000 for a total of $300,000 to complete the final design of the <br />Ramsey Rail Station. He stated that since then, Kimley Horn learned that its estimate was <br />understated and has revised its estimate to $357,000. He indicated that of the original $174,268 <br />preliminary design contract, $37,000 remains, so a total of $320,000 needs to be funded, or an <br />additional $10,000 from the City and $10,000 from the Anoka County Rail Authority; the <br />Finance Committee voted to recommend approval of this additional amount. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Look, seconded by Councilmember Dehen, to approve the Report <br />from the Finance Committee and take the following action: Adopt Resolution #09-08-196 <br />authorizing proposal from Northland Strategies for strategic financial planning proposal in an <br />amount not to exceed $13,600; Postpone the partial acquisition of Lot 1, Block 1, Alpaca Estates <br />pending completion of the preliminary design for the Armstrong Boulevard interchange; to <br />amend the cost sharing amount approved in Resolution #Q9-06-122 authorizing a cost sharing <br />amount with ACRRA for final design for the Northstar Commuter Rail station in Ramsey at a <br />cost not to exceed $160,000 utilizing the Landfill Trust Fund. <br /> <br />Motion carried. V oting Yes: Mayor Ramsey, Councilmembers Look, Dehen, Elvig, McGlone, <br />and Wise. Voting No: None. Absent: Councilmember Jeffrey. <br /> <br />Case #12: <br /> <br />Introduce Ordinance to Add City Code Section 9.17 to Permit Wind Energy <br />Conversion Systems as a Conditional Use; Case of the City of Ramsey <br /> <br />Associate Planner Gladhill stated this case introduces an ordinance for wind energy conversion <br />systems; staffhas been working under a moratorium of these types of requests. <br /> <br />Councilmember Wise stated he thought it was redundant and counter-productive to put a wind <br />generator ordinance in place when it comes to setbacks of one and one-half times the height of <br />the tower and 1,000 feet from any adjacent residential unit. He stated he felt this was exorbitant <br />and most cities are not doing that type of setback. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Gladhill indicated that part of this whole process was the public input process <br />and research shows that noise and shadow flicker all the primary concerns and those concerns <br />appear to be mitigated once the structure is beyond 1,000 feet from any residence. <br /> <br />City Council / August 25, 2009 <br />Page 18 of 19 <br />