My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/13/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2009
>
Agenda - Council - 10/13/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 4:22:09 PM
Creation date
10/8/2009 12:00:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/13/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
223
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PEDSAFE ; recommended guidelines /priorities for sidewalks and walkways <br />analysis, or if there is a large amount of capital available for <br />sidewalk construction. If there are a lot of competing <br />projects, a more sophisticated point system can be used to <br />explain to the public why certain projects were funded and <br />others were not, <br />Page 6 of 12 <br />of arterial streets that were within school walking zones, a <br />pedestrian generator area, and a neighborhood <br />commercial area that did not have sidewalks on either side <br />of the street, <br />There were nearly 4.8 km (3 mi) of arterial streets that <br />A point system can be developed in many ways; the system were within school walking areas, but outside of <br />should be simple and produce desired outcomes. Any and neighborhood commercial areas and pedestrian <br />all of the criteria listed above can be assigned a range of generators that did not have sidewalks on either side of <br />numbers and then be used to analyze the need for the street, Thls was compared to a citywide deficiency of <br />more than 32 km (20 mi) of arterial streets that lacked <br />improvement at given locations. For example, a corridor sidewalks on both sides of the street. <br />could be assigned points based on the number of "walking <br />along roadway" crashes over a 5 -year period, the number of By developing these and other numbers, the pedestrian <br />buses that travel the corridor during peak times, and the program was able to put together packages of information <br />proximity to elementary schools. This method is time- that demonstrated what could be accomplished with <br />consuming because it will be necessary to analyze multiple additional funding. What everyone thought to be an <br />locations with sidewalk needs to create a list of priority unsolvable multi - million dollar problem was reduced to a <br />projects. series of smaller, fundable projects that decisionmakers <br />could endorse..The result was Increased funding and a <br />priorities new optimism that meaningful progress could be made on <br />3. Prioritized List -- Both the overlapping in riorities and the solving Seattle's sidewalk deficiencies, <br />points methods will produce an initial list of prioritized <br />projects. The next step Is to refine the list so that It works, <br />using common sense. One important consideration is that when roadways are resurfaced, rehabilitated, or replaced, <br />curb ramps must be added if there are pedestrian walkways., In addition, the U.S. Department of Justice considers bus <br />stops to be pedestrian walkways requiring access for people with disabilities, so areas near transit should be given <br />priority accordingly. Improving pedestrian crossings, particularly on arterial streets, may also be an important part of <br />some projects. Other important questions include: Are priority locations ones that might be expected? Are there many <br />surprises? Are priority locations in line with community priorities and expectations? Are some priorities at locations with <br />very low pedestrian use? If the answer to these questions is "yes," then the criteria or the methodology should be <br />evaluated and possibly revised to create outcomes that better reflect expectations and desires. The methodologies <br />should be used to prioritize known needs, not to create a new set of priorities that don't make sense. <br />The final step is to create packages of fundable projects. The prioritization process should result in reasonable <br />packages that decision - makers can embrace and support. For example, it may be possible to install sidewalks on both <br />sides of every arterial within a half -mile of every elementary school for $5 million over a period of 5 years. Or, it may be <br />possible to replace sidewalks in neighborhood commercial areas for $2 million over a period of 3 years. The objective is <br />to take what may appear to be an unsolvable problem (endless need for more funds) and to package it in such a way <br />that it begins to address some of the most critical pedestrian needs in a community, <br />Sidewalk Design Guidelines <br />Sidewalk Placement in Large and Small Cities <br />Continuous sidewalks should be placed along both sides of all fully improved arterial, collector, and local streets in <br />urban and suburban areas. Sidewalks should connect to side streets and adjacent buildings. Accessible crossings <br />should be provided across median islands, frontage road medians, and other raised islands. <br />Sidewalks, Walkways, and Shoulders in Rural Areas <br />A safe walking area must be provided outside the motor vehicle traffic travelway. Sidewalks along rural roads should be <br />well separated from the travelway. Isolated residential areas should have a pedestrian connection to the rest of the rural <br />http:// www. walkingirifo .org/pedsafe /noreinfo sidewalks.cfm 8/19/2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.