Laserfiche WebLink
CASE #: <br />REQUEST FOR DIVISION OF REMAINING ASSESSMENT BALANCE FOR IMPROVEMENT <br />PROJECT #05 -23 BETWEEN TWO OF THREE LOTS OF EBONY WOODS; <br />CASE OF TIM HOLM <br />By: Tim. Gladhill, Associate Planner <br />Background: <br />On June 17, 2008, City Council granted final plat approval to Ebony Woods and approved the <br />Development Agreement. The plat consists of three single - family units on the property located on the <br />east side of Ebony Street N.W., just south of the Superbowl facility. <br />Notification: <br />No public hearing is required. <br />Observations: <br />In 2005, a street improvement project (IP #05 -23) was approved for a sanitary sewer and Ebony Street. <br />The Subject Property was issued an assessment in the amount of $43,052.00. To date, the Applicant has <br />paid a total of $17,220.80 of the total assessment of $43,052.00, with a remaining balance of $25,831.20, <br />Park of the assessment was for two connections to the sanitary sewer and water trunk lines, per the <br />request of the Applicant for future development purposes. It should be noted that Lots 1 and 2 have <br />lateral sanitary sewer and water services stubbed to the parcels, per the request of the Applicant. Lot 3 <br />does not have the benefit of a lateral service installed to date, as required by the final plat, and therefore <br />was not part of the original assessment. <br />Upon recording of the Ebony Woods plat, the remaining assessment balance needs to be divided in some <br />manner between the three lots created. The City's policy has been to divide the assessment balance <br />between the newly created lots based on lot size, giving each lot its pro -rata share of the original <br />assessment. <br />The Applicant has requested that the remaining assessment balance be divided between Lots 1 and 2. <br />The Applicant is requesting that none of the remaining assessment balance be attributed to Lot 3, thus <br />allowing transfer based on a proposed sale price by a potential buyer. All three lots would essentially be <br />the same size,.should the plat be recorded. The Applicant has stated that a potential sale of one of the <br />three lots is pending. The Applicant has further stated that the sale of this lot is needed in order to <br />produce the capital to pay for development fees before the plat can be recorded. The Applicant has until <br />June 17, 2010 to record the plat. There is some risk involved with the proposal in that the price of Lots 1 <br />and 2 rise due to the fact that these two lots absorb more of the overall cost which would not be attributed <br />equally to Lot 3, <br />Staff feels the City is protected in collecting the remaining assessment balance, should the request be <br />approved. Approximately 40% of the original assessment has been paid to date. The Applicant will <br />continue to pay the assessment balance as prescribed in the original assessment. Should either Lot 1 or <br />Lot 2 be sold, the remaining assessment balance on that lot will need to be paid in full. <br />