My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
11/05/09
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Board of Adjustment
>
Agendas
>
2000's
>
2009
>
11/05/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2025 4:17:53 PM
Creation date
10/30/2009 9:34:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Board of Adjustment
Document Date
11/05/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CASE # , <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A DETACHED ACCESSORY BUILDING <br />NEARER THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE THAN THE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE AT 5421 <br />165TH LANE NW; CASE OF ROGER AND BARBARA ANDERSON . <br />By: Environmental Coordinator Chris Anderson <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Section 9,11.02 of the Ramsey City Code states that on properties leSt? than two (2) acres hi size, no <br />accessory building shall be constructed nearer the front property .Iine than the principal structure. Mr. <br />and Mrs. Anderson have applied for a varia~ce to construct a detached accessory building nearer the <br />. front property line than the principal structure on the propertY at 5421 165th Lane NW. . . <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />The subject property is roughly 1.3 acres in size and thus, any detached accessory building, according to <br />City Code, should be constructed in the side or rear yard. However,. the subject prop~rty is a riparian lot <br />along the Rum River and is in the Wild and. Scenic River Overlay District. In 198i, the City adopted <br />regulations for propertie~ within the Wild and Scenic RJver Overlay District, including a building setback <br />of 150 feet from the ordinary high water mark. <br /> <br />The Andersons' house is approximateJy 140 feet from the ordinary high water mark and is considered <br />lawfUl, non-copforming. Also, the individual sewage treatment system (ISTS) is located along the side of <br />the existing, attached garaged and extends into the front yard of the property making that area <br />unbuildable as well. Placement of the new garage in the back yard between the house and river would <br />only intensify the encroachment of the river setback. <br /> <br />Rather than locating the proposed garage in the rear yard,. which would intensify the encroachment of the <br />fiver setback (and still require a variance); the better alternative is to construct the garage in the front <br />yard. The Andersons are proposing to construct the new g~rage approximately forty-three (43) feet from <br />the front property line and over 200 feet from the ordinary high water mark. <br /> <br />The dimensions of the proposed building are twenty-four by thirty feet (24' x 30'), equaling 720 square <br />feet, and combined with the 816 square foot attached garaged, results in 1,536 square feet of accessory <br />building space, well below the allotted square footage (2,200) for accessory building space. . Also, both <br />the sidewall height and the overall height of the proposed building comply with current regulations for <br />properties of this size. <br /> <br />On lots greater than two (2) acres in size, accessory buildings are permitted nearer the front property line <br />than the home as long as the building meets certain criteria. Staff typically applies these same criteria on <br />lots less than two (2) acres in size when a variance is requested, including matching the exterior finish <br />with that of the home. The proposed building will be constructed with architectural standards, such as <br />soffit, fascia and eave overhahgs, to match the home. The" exterior of the home is a combination of brick. <br />face (first story front wall) and hardboard lap siding (second story and side and rear walls). The <br />Andersons' are proposing to use hardboard lap siding exclusively as the exterior finish of the building <br />and not incorporating the brick face to match the home exactly. . <br /> <br />Staff provided the DNR the application and supporting information and they had no. objections to the <br />requested variance. <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.