My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/10/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2009
>
Agenda - Council - 11/10/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 4:22:48 PM
Creation date
11/5/2009 2:06:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/10/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
371
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />standard width (32 ft) residential street having frontage of approximately 70 feet (which is the <br />standard frontage of the benefitted lots in this case). <br /> <br />A suggested was made that perhaps some other split of the total project cost might be considered; <br />perhaps a 75 - 25 split. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen.asked to bring this to a work session. <br /> <br />Consensus was to hold a public hearing and have discussion with Council on the appropriate <br />method of assessment. Himmer suggested gathering information and develop policy from there. <br /> <br />Chairperson Elvig agreed to move forward with project and move forward. <br /> <br />Action: <br /> <br />Consensus was to have the staff move forward with the revision of the feasibility study pursuant <br />to the direction given at the meeting and to review alternative assessment policies at a Council <br />Work session. <br /> <br />Case #4 <br /> <br />Discussion on Street Widths, Parking Restrictions on Both Public and <br />Private Streets <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Fire Chief Kapler brings this forward to discuss two separate issues with parking on both public <br />streets and private streets. He is requesting the Public Works department provide signage in the <br />Village of Sunfish Lake development and have the police department enforce it. <br /> <br />Chief Kapler suggested asking the Police Chief to attend the next Public Works Committee <br />meeting to discuss the enforcement side of the private road situation The Engineering Staff will <br />provide the cost of signing and striping for discussion at the next meeting. <br /> <br />Action: <br /> <br />No action necessary. <br /> <br />Case #5 <br /> <br />Discuss Speed Limit Modifications to Alpine and Sunwood Drives <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Assistant City Engineer Jankowski reviewed the staff report. Both Alpine Drive and Sunwood. <br />Drive each have. three to four different speed limits which change at various points along their <br />length. The variation of the speed limits is confusing to citizens and law enforcement officials <br />alike. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.