Agenda - Council - 11/10/2009 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

illustrates the existing street profile along with both of these options. Boulevard trees would be installed on both sides of the street at 50 foot intervals. Under both Options A and B the street modifications would begin 150 feet north of 140tl1 A venue since thjs is the point at which the street section transitions into the additional lanes required for the CR 116 intersection. The street modifications would again taper back into the existing section north of 143rd Avenue. The sidewalk on the west side would connect between the existing bituminous trail at CR 116 and the existing bituminous trail located at the southwest corner of Terrace Hill apartment. On the east side of Dysprosium the sidewalk will connect from the sidewalk on the Savanna Oaks apartment building south to the north side of 140th A venue wh~!,~itft:;wQuld connect to a trail on the south side of this intersection. . A){' ~,.;~~~~ ~~~ .' Although similar sidewalk improvements were c(;msidyr&~1for 1'4~~~yenue and Argon ',"," '.',,;. <,...~~._;\':{.. Street, both of these streets have setbacks of as litt!~~a8:?4,f. reet betw~ft:he curb and the residences. Placement of a sidewalk with even a niodest width terrace" ", .'ct restrict ' y~ ,y driveway parldng to a single vehicle. There ar,~ti~~Rnsidera11!e number of' ,..~i,;~~Jes stored within the driveways 011 these streets. As an aIterti: .... ., t~':r~'posed that p.#lclng be restricted on the north and east sides of these streets hite strip demarcate a walldng / bicycle lane. ''';~tt1h, This project will reconnect each existirt' . ;. ~ opening t8~~~~;fiewly paved street. The ~ ~.WA~~ driveway approaches between the street 6.\1' "~,walk sh~i1T be replaced with concrete at a standard width-of 18 feet. The.\drly;ew ,,'::'ent beyond the sidewalk shall be neatly saw CU!)W([;;tlRl.~~ped with th~~~lme mat~f1a:i and in the same width as the existing driveway. ."'" ';'toratioi1~l~~ll.inc1ude t1W protection or repair of any in'igation ' systems or invisib1t .~. Mail~1fbxes may be '~~JR,cated to accommodate construction but shall be returned to thel ':'~~igi~~1~l~,~~iR.~s upo~ifermination of the project. Disturbed turf areas shall h~'%.e.$.:tQrJ,~p wiffi:l~llsoiraYia::s:Q;a~~~$' 'li~~~~'1;:$'}:'{'::;:':;:~~~i'l~ ":':*\i~~1~:;,. '" """}' EST~~TED COSTS{{::;:::; ":::;::<,:::;"..",4' ,~,~:i;::~\::~~t~~~::~'~%~r~~ ,:~~:s:~~' The cost (ft~1\' project inC'~!\E:ling d"'erhead is estimated to be $512,754 for Option A, and $37,373less ~:::o;~ption B. .~etai1s oftbe project construction cost are presented in . Appendix A. Tll~~J.l)ject ~~hhead, which adds an additional 30 % of the construction cost include the fon~j!g~" ':~i~~'< · Engineering aesign . Project administration . Bonding and legal . Inspection and testing . Contingencies. 8% 5% 2% 5% 10% 3