My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/26/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2003
>
Agenda - Council - 08/26/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 3:52:49 PM
Creation date
8/25/2003 12:09:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/26/2003
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
387
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
designated land use back to Single Fa .rn, ily Residential. The Council directed staff to place this <br />issue on a Council work session agenda? <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook suggested that the area of the existing single-£arnily homes be changed <br />back to Single Family Residential and the other area stay as 'Places to Work'. <br /> <br />CiW Administrator Norman stated that it is good planning to identi~, the area as 'Places to <br />Work", but there are currently no plans for the area so he did not have a problem with changing <br />the area where the homes are back to Single Family Residential. He noted that the change would <br />require a Comprehensive Plan amendment. <br /> <br />Councilmember Eivig inquired if it is di~%ult for the property owners to use their property if'the <br />land is desi~m2ated as 'Places to W'ork:. <br /> <br />Community Development .Director Frolik explained that it could create problems with mortgage <br />companies. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook noted that it would also make it almost impossible for someone to sell <br />their home. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak felt that the land use designation should be changed back to Single <br />Family Residential. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig inquired if it was possible to identify, the land use as Mixed Use since <br />residential is a permitted use; then in the future they would not need to amend the <br />Comprehensive Plan if the area we_re to be redeveloped. <br /> <br />.Councilmember Kurak inquired if a Mixed Use designation would have a negativ,e impact on a <br />property, owner trying to get a mortgage on their property. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frotik replied that she did not think that it would since <br />residential is a permitted use under the Mixed Use designation. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook stated that the problem he could see with the Mixed Use designation is <br />that one property owner may decide to sell their property to a commercial business and 'then all <br />the other homes would be surrounded by the commercial business. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman felt that they should respect the opinion of the residents that live in <br />the area and change the land use back to Single Family Residential. <br /> <br />Consensus of the City Council was to direct staff to proceed with changing the land use <br />designation back to Single Family Residential for the parcels on the north side of Pdvlyn Street. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik explained that the second issue had to do with the <br />Holasek/Hamilton property, south of Pdverdale and Highway #10, west' of the hotel. This <br /> <br />-246- <br /> <br />Ci~ Council Work Session/June 10, 2(}03 <br /> Page 2 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.