Laserfiche WebLink
<br />DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS <br /> <br />. The Market Area saw significant increases in other family households (+3,222 households, or <br />+50%), which includes single-parents and unmarried couples with children. Roommate <br />households also saw an increase of +1,410 households (+52%) in the Market Area during the <br />1990s. Growth in this household type reflects the societal trend of unmarried couples living <br />together. Many ofthese households are candidates for affordable rental housing, particularly <br />single parent households. <br /> <br />. The number of people living alone grew by +5,310 households (+77%). This reflects the in- <br />creased number of people choosing to remain single, some singles preferring not to have <br />roommates and an increase in the number of seniors. Because they rely on a single income, <br />households living alone are often candidates for affordable rental housing. <br /> <br />Employment Growth Trends and Projections <br /> <br />The strength of the labor market and locations of employers are key components that drive <br />.household growth in an area, since many households desire to live near their places of <br />employment for convenience. Over the past several years, however, households have been more <br />willing to commute from homes in outlying areas to employment centers in order to obtain new <br />construction homes at affordable price points. This trend fueled home sales in the outlying areas <br />of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area in the early part of the decade. <br /> <br />Jobs Located in the Market Area <br /> <br />Table D-8 presents data on historic and forecast employment growth trends in Market Area <br />communities. The information in Table D-8 is supplied by Metropolitan Council and has been <br />adjusted by Maxfield Research Inc. using current employment data from the MN Department of <br />Employment and Economic Development and our estimates of projected employment growth <br />during the next decade based on a slower recovery in employment markets. We expect that em- <br />ployment growth will not occur in any substantial measure until after 2013 and previous fore- <br />casts have been reduced by 20%. <br /> <br />Following Table D-8 is Table D-9, which presents covered employment for Anoka County in <br />2000 and 2008 (the most recent annual data available). Covered employment data is calculated <br />as an annual average and reveals the number of jobs in the County that are covered by unem- <br />ployment insurance. Most farm jobs, entrepreneurs and some other types of jobs are not covered <br />by unemployment insurance and are excluded from the table. The data comes from the Minne- <br />sota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED). <br /> <br />· Since employment growth generally fuels household growth, employment trends are an im- <br />portant indicator of housing demand. From 1990 to 2000, the Market Area experienced <br />strong employment growth with an increase of +37.9%, or about +16,930 jobs. <br /> <br />· In the PMA, the community that led employment growth numerically and by percentage was <br />Andover,which added +1,860 jobs for a growth rate of +155.2%. Following close behin <br />large share of growth also occurred in the Ramsey (+1,646 jobs, +84.8%). <br /> <br /> <br />MAXFIELD RESEARCH INe. <br />