Laserfiche WebLink
<br />To: City of Ramsey-Inspections Staff Nov. 18th, 2009 <br /> <br />From: Mark Hilliard-Owner 5161 156th Lane NW Ramsey, MN 55303 <br /> <br />Re: Photographic evidence of GopherOne electrical utility location <br /> <br />To Inspection staff: <br />I want this document entered as part of the evidence packet you will present to the <br />Variance Board at the upcoming Variance Board meeting that will address my re- <br />quest for a variance on my lot to build a storage shed. <br /> <br />Per your request for confirmation that there are pre-existing electrical utility ser- <br />vices that run directly through the "alternative shed location" you sent me via the . <br />.PDF aerial photograph you sent me, I am enclosing photographs of the path <br />(identified by GopherOne) that my current main electrical distribution line fol- <br />lows as it travels from the road to my house along the north side of my driveway. <br />As you can easily see for yourself YOUR proposed alternative location would <br />place a shed directly over at least 15 or more feet of my main electrical feed. I <br />already knew about this utility location and it just one of several reasons (in addi- <br />tion to mature tree destruction, and major landfill requirements, etc.) that a shed <br />should NOT be built at your proposed alternate location. As I also mentioned this <br />line is not deeply buried and would likely have to be relocated or re-buried-at <br />. considerable expense - to avoid damage by concrete foundations. The tall white <br />stakes in the pictUres approximate corner locations <br />of a shed build per your proposal. <br /> <br /> <br />28 <br />