Laserfiche WebLink
<br />installation of automatic locks for the restroom doors at the concession stand building and <br />restroom doors at the Park Center building. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Chairperson Look asked if there were issues there with vandalism. Park <br />Supervisor Riverblood responded vandalism was not a big problem, but people did not like <br />returning the keys. He noted the locks had a panic bar on them so people could get out. <br /> <br />Motion carried. V oting Yes: Chairperson Look, Councilmembers Wise and Elvig. Voting No: <br />None. <br /> <br />Case #2: <br /> <br />Consider Parking Ramp Phase II Design Services <br /> <br />Public Works Director Olson reviewed the staff report. <br /> <br />Councilmember Wise asked once everything was approved, how long could they hold onto the <br />grant money before it needed to be used. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Olson responded they would be swapping with other projects that are <br />more ready and those funds would be used when there was another project directly adjacent to <br />the parking lot. <br /> <br />Chairperson Look questioned the timing with respect to an RFP. He indicated he wanted to <br />know they were not overpaying and getting a good deal. <br /> <br />Public 'Works Director Olson responded he understood the desire that the City shop <br />competitively and not overpay for the services received. He indicated he was surprised the <br />amount was as low as it was and commented on the importance of consistency and continuity <br />between the two phases. He indicated he understood the reasons for proceeding with an RFP, <br />but because there was so much past history, he felt it was extremely important for a single <br />designer to continue through the process. He indicated the timeline was relatively short and he <br />wanted to move forward with this as quickly as possible, estimating it may take 5-6 weeks before <br />a contract is awarded if the RFP process is followed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig responded in the past he had supported continuity, but his concern was in <br />the timing. He noted there was a concept for a V A hospital with the possibility of a ramp. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Olson stated the proposal was for the expansion on the 200 stalls and any <br />modification to that would not necessarily mean they could not use the $3.5 million. <br /> <br />Chairperson Look asked what other engineering firms could do this. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Olson responded Knutson and Kimberly Horn could, but if the project <br />goes out for an RFP, it would extend the timing and the figures would have to be made public. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich noted LSA Design's work could be integrated and they would be <br />interested in submitting and RFP, but the question was whether this price would be worth the <br /> <br />Finance Committee / September 8, 2009 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />