My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
02/04/10
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Board of Adjustment
>
Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
02/04/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2025 4:21:57 PM
Creation date
1/28/2010 1:06:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Board of Adjustment
Document Date
02/04/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Public Hearine: <br /> <br />Mayor Ramsey called the public hearing to order at 7: 1 0 p.m. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Planning Manager Miller reviewed the staff report. <br /> <br />Citizen Input <br /> <br />Suzanne Anderson stated she had an interest in housing as well as being a landlord. She noted <br />her concern was the common good and she believed this proposal was going in the wrong <br />direction. She believed this was an opportunity to keep up the rental housing and it was a good <br />ordinance for the City. <br /> <br />.Motion by C()uncilmembel~ Elvig, seconded by Councilmember Look, to close the public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />Motion carried. V oting Yes: Mayor Ramsey, Councilmembers Elvig, Look, Dehen, McGlone, <br />and Wise. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />The public hearing was closed at 7: 15 p.m. <br /> <br />Council Business <br /> <br />Mayor Ramsey called the regular City Council meeting back to order at 7:15 p.m. <br /> <br />Councilmember Look understood Ms. Anderson's concerns, but the City could not tell a <br />homeowner to keep the rental home up under this Ordinance. In his opinion, the Ol'dinance was <br />a violation of the tenant's rights and he did not see the value in the Ordinance. He believed a lot <br />of Ms. Anderson's concerns could be addressed by other City Ordinances. <br /> <br />Mayor Ramsey st(,lted in his opinion this Ordinance also violated the constitutional rights of a <br />tenant and he supported repealing the Ordinance. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen stated he understood landlords and tenants had right, but he wanted to <br />ensure the City was not getting into that aspect. He asked from a City perspective, what were <br />they trying to accomplish. He believed if the City could save one person he believed this was <br />responsible government. He was not in favor of repealing the Ordinance. He asked the <br />Councilmembers who were going to vote in favor of this to wait until they could back stop this <br />with some sort of a maintenance ordinance that would take care of some of the exterior <br />. problems. <br /> <br />City Council! January 12,2010 <br />Page 6 of 13 <br /> <br />P19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.