Laserfiche WebLink
<br />To: City of Ramsey-Inspections S!aff Nov. 18th, 2009 <br /> <br />From: Mark Hilliard-Owner 5161 156th Lane NW Ramsey, lVIN 55303 <br /> <br />. Re: Photographic evidence of GopherOne ele.ctrical utility location <br /> <br />To Inspection staff:., <br />I want this document entered as part of the evidence packet you will present to the <br />Variance Board at the upcoming Variance Board meeting that will address my-re~ . <br />quest for a varian~e on'my tot to build a storage shed. . <br /> <br /> <br />fer your request for confirmatjon that there are pre-e~sting electrical utility ser~ <br />vices that run directly thrmlghthe."alternative shed location" you sent me via the, <br />.PDF aerial photograph you sent me, I am enclosing pho,tographs of the path .' <br />(identified by GopherOne) that my.current main,'electrical distribution liriefol~ <br />lows as it travels from the road to my house along the north si.de of my driveway. <br />As you can easily see for yourself YOUR propos.ed alternative location would <br />place.a shed directly over at least 15 or more feet of my main electi-ical feed. I <br />already kllew about this ut~1ity locatipn and it just one of several n~asons (in addi~ <br />, tion to mature tree destructioh, andmaj or landfill requirements, etc.) that ,a shed" <br />sho:uld NO~ be built at YOlll' proposed alternate location. As I also mentiohedthis. <br />line is not deeply buried and would likely have to be relocated or re-buried~at <br />, considerable expense ~ to avoid damage by concrete foundations. :The tall white. <br />stakes in the pictures approximate corner locations <br />of a shed build per your proposal. <br /> <br />30 <br />